the Valdas reputation was so bad that we called it the destruction of property
yes
burgundy
Intentional destruction of property is vandalism.
Graffiti is 'vandalism,' 'destruction of property' and insofar as it pertains to a public school building, 'destruction of government property'
Yes, driving across someone else's grass is trespassing and any destruction would be destruction of property. They could bring suit for both.
Vandalism, destruction of property.
The destruction of federal property of more than $1000 in Maine would likely be classified as a felony offense. The specific classification would depend on the laws of Maine and the nature and circumstances of the destruction, but it could potentially fall under felony property damage or destruction charges.
The answer to this question cannot be known. The presiding judge will have the final answer on this. The person that destroyed the property is probably chargeable with civil contempt of court, which carries no jail time - but also possibly for the criminal charge of destruction of property.
Destruction killing people, crops, and property
Tornadoes cause damage and destruction to property and vegetation..
Generally, losing something is not the same as malicious destruction of property. In order to prove that someone maliciously destroyed property the remains of the property having been destroyed is normally presented as evidence of such destruction. The misplacement or loss of something would be considered more of an accident -- something for which you could be sued in civil court, but probably not prosecuted for in criminal court.