Athens did, financed by the taxes it levied on the cities of its empire.
Sparta gained one when the Persian king gave it the money to build and man it.
Athens had a strong navy, while Sparta had a better army
This varied from time to time. In the 5th Century BCE Athens built a powerful one which dominated for 80 years until the Persians subsidised a competing one for the Peloponnesian League which destroyed the Athenian fleet.
athens
They were polar opposites, Athens being a scholarly, open empire, with Sparta being a military state that detested change. Sparta had a powerful army, Athens had a powerful navy. Both were also ambitious and wanted to expand their reaches of influence. They were bound to bump heads a few times.
the only war between Athens & Sparta is the pelioponnesion war where Sparta fought Athens because they thought they were too powerful. in the end Athens surrendered and Sparta then became the most powerful.
Athens had a powerful navy.
Sparta - its army. Athens - its navy.
Yes, because Sparta and Athens were once allies but then Athens turned on Sparta and Sparta responded with war.
A navy is not on land, so neither had the best navy.
Sparta had a better army by far, but Athens had a much better navy.
It did until 405 BCE when the navy was destroyed by a Peloponnesian fleet led by Sparta at Aigospotamai in the Dardanelles Strait.
Athens was a democracy and had more liberal (for that time) thinking and had good navy. Sparta was a oligarchy was more conservative and militaristic and had great army. In the war between them (Peloponnesian war), Sparta won.