yes
when the constitution was presented to the anti federalists they rejected it on the grounds that "we the people" really meant the aristocrates as well as the fact that there was no mention of liberty and the press. that is how we got the bill of rights.
The United States Senate has the power to approve or reject individuals who have been nominated to the Supreme Court. Their power is outlined in Article 2 of the Constitution.
Authors are individuals, they can accept or reject any ideas that they wish.
The Anti-Federalist Party opposed the ratification of the U.S. Constitution during the period when the states were considering it. They believed that the Constitution would create a too powerful central government that would undermine the rights of the states. Their purpose was to advocate for a decentralized system of government with strong state powers and specific protections for individual liberties.
Referendum is a right reserved to the people to approve or reject an act of the legislature, or the right of the people to approve or reject legislation that has been referred to them by the legislature.
whether to accept or reject the constitution.
reject laws
whether to accept or reject the constitution.
hes dumb
Because not all of the citizens had an opportunity to vote on it.
i dont know. im sorry :D
According the United States Constitution, the US Senate can refuse the president's appointments. It can also reject treaties that have been agreed to by the president.
As directed by Congress, states held ratification conventions, to either ratify or reject the proposed US Constitution. It was required that 9 states ratify in order for the Constitution to become official.
when the constitution was presented to the anti federalists they rejected it on the grounds that "we the people" really meant the aristocrates as well as the fact that there was no mention of liberty and the press. that is how we got the bill of rights.
Sean Paul is from Kingston, Jamaica.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.
Some southerners felt that confiscating property violated the constitution.