answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, Dr. Jekyll did feel guilty and sad about the crimes that Mr. Hyde committed. He struggled with the duality of his nature and the consequences of his actions while under the influence of his alter ego.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did Dr.Jekyll feal guilty and sad about the crimes Mr.Hyde committed?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why is Scotland guilty with the slave trade?

Scotland's involvement in the slave trade was through its participation in the British Empire, which heavily profited from the trade in enslaved people. Scottish merchants and shipowners were involved in transporting enslaved Africans to the Americas, and there were also plantations owned by Scots in the Caribbean that relied on enslaved labor. Scotland has since acknowledged its role in the transatlantic slave trade and has taken steps to address this collective responsibility.


Do murderers on death row feel guilty about their crimes or suffer?

Murderers on death row may feel guilty about their crimes. The only way to know is if they release a statement showing remorse.


How was Hans frank killed?

He was found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity and executed on october 16,1946.


Was aleece hastings was guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors?

Yes.


What crime was Nixon most guilty of?

Nixon was never convicted of any crimes. He was pardoned by President Gerald Ford a month after he resigned "for any crimes he committed or may have committed between January 20, 1969 and August 9, 1974".


Who was found guilty of war crimes during the Vietnam War?

Lt. Calley was found guilty of burning the village of Mei Lai.


Was Leonardo da Vinci a rapists?

There are no records to indicate that he was ever guilty of such crimes.


How did Thomas McKay prove Louis riel guilty?

He told them that he was comitting crimes and all that


What was martin bormann accused of?

He was tried in absentia at the Nuremburg Trials and found guilty of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, which carried the death penalty.


Should a person be accused of a crime even though he or she is not yet proven guilty or innocent?

People should be accused of crimes if there is some substantial evidence that they have committed them. You do not have to be proven guilty in order to be accused, because if a person is not accused, there won't be a trial, and there will therefore be no opportunity to prove either guilt or innocence in a legal sense.


What is a guilty party?

A guilty party is the person (or occasionally an animal) who actually committed the misdeed or the crime.


What is it called when the president forgives those guilty of crimes against the federal government?

Its called a pardon