yes he did
Elbridge Gerry did not sign the United States Constitution. He was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 but refused to sign the final document due to concerns over the lack of a Bill of Rights and the extensive powers granted to the federal government. Gerry later became an advocate for the inclusion of individual rights in the Constitution.
Elbridge Gerry was an Anti-Federalist. Although he initially supported the Constitution, he later opposed its ratification due to concerns over the lack of a Bill of Rights and the potential for a strong central government to infringe on individual liberties. He is best known for his role in the creation of the term "gerrymandering," which refers to manipulating electoral district boundaries for political advantage.
Benjamin Franklin supported the Constitution by emphasizing the importance of unity and the need for a strong central government to maintain order and protect the rights of citizens. He argued that the compromises made in the Constitution were necessary for the greater good of the nation. In contrast, Elbridge Gerry opposed the Constitution primarily due to concerns about its lack of a Bill of Rights, fearing that it could lead to tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties. He also worried that the proposed government structure favored the wealthy and elite at the expense of the common people.
George Mason and Patrick Henry are probably the two most prominent Founding Fathers who refused to sign the constitution. Mason refused to sign because at the time, the constitution lacked a Bill of Rights.
Of the 55 delegates, 42 attended most of the meetings, and 39 delegates (and the attesting secretary) actually signed the Constitution. Edmund Randolph and George Mason of Virginia and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts refused to sign, due in part to the lack of a bill of rights.
Delegates Elbridge Gerry and George Mason opposed the new Constitution primarily because they believed it lacked sufficient protections for individual rights and liberties. They were concerned that the absence of a Bill of Rights could lead to government overreach and tyranny. Additionally, both feared that the centralized power granted to the federal government would undermine state sovereignty and the rights of the people. Their refusal to sign reflected a commitment to ensuring that fundamental rights were explicitly safeguarded in the governing framework.
Not only did he support it but he organized the first formal call for the Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights
No he did not he was a Federalist, The Anti-Federalist wanted the Bill of Rights
yes, he agreed completely with the Bill of Rights. He signed it.
yes
Bill of Rights