No, England was occupied with gaining more territory. Also, England was separated from the colonies by 3,000 miles of sea. England made no attempt to supervise the colonies.
In the southern Colonies there was no westward movement because of the appalacian mountains. In the New England Colonies they were close to the ocean and were a trade region. The Middle Colonies were known as the "bread basket colonies". There were also no big mountains and some hills.
Georgia was a buffer to protect England's colonies from Spain and France, whose colonies in Florida and Louisiana, respectively, were very close to Georgia and England's other colonies in the South.
They lived on the east coast of America close to the Appalachian mountains
The British governed with little supervision of the American colonies before 1760.Britain's harsh tax and trade policies of the 1760s fanned resentment in the colonies.
Yes and No. One part of the series of laws was the Boston Port Act which did close Boston Harbor which was a key trade port in the colonies and one of the biggest in New England, so it did cut off trade from New England, and essentialy the north, from the south. It did not cut off trade between the American colonies and England the country.
The middle colonies consisted of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New York and Delaware. Dutch Connecticut is sometimes considered one of the middle colonies because of its close associations, but is often included in the New England colonies.
the state close to England is Europe
Some people left England to find cheap land, adventure, or the opportunity to do something on the frontier that they couldn't do in the old country. Some came to practice a religion other than what the king approved.
were are the rives and lakes close to the 13 british colonies
Liverpool is in England. close to Wales, but in England.
The bad things that happend is the starving time.
It's close to London, England.