Yes, they did, but not with the intention of deception. It is typical to portray figures like Jesus with characteristics common to the prevailing culture. Asian countries portray Jesus with characteristics that are distinctly Asian.
water and blood
Jesus never started a religion.
the cross is what jesus died on but jesus rose again. the catholic cross reminds us of that. but the orthodox cross has a diagonal line in it. one side points up the otherside down. this stands for the two people who were hung with jesus. the one to jesus' right went to heaven the other to hell.
As to why the europeans claims that Jesus is white, that has been widely circulated by the media based on what they claim is his family tree.Because Europeans are white and don't know any better.
Integrity!
Jesus physical appearance is NOT recorded in the Bible.
Jesus was dark skinned
light and birth in the darkest days of winter
light and birth in the darkest days of winter
Truly God and truly man, immutable, compassionate, just, bold ... Edit: The three characteristics listed in the question are unbiblical when applied to Jesus.
All Christians are Jesus' sons and daughters. Jesus had no son in the normal sense of physical descendants.
A:For the early Gnostic Christians, it was not important that Jesus had a physical body, and many Gnostics believed otherwise. For them, not having a physical body was further evidence of Jesus' divinity.Another branch of Christianity, the forerunner of the Catholic-Orthodox Church, taught that Jesus had a physical body in order that he suffer pain on the cross. It was probably also important to deny any truth in Gnostic beliefs.