Yes because he thought that atticus would be the best man to defend him and respected his morals
Judge Taylor chose Atticus to defend Tom Robinson because he knew Atticus was a fair and respected lawyer in the community. Despite the racial tensions in Maycomb, Judge Taylor believed that Atticus would provide a competent and ethical defense for Tom.
This is a true statement. In court the defendant will be represented by counsel and may choose to testify, or not.
A defendant does not have the right to an attorney in a legal proceeding if they can afford to hire one themselves and choose not to do so.
Yes, a victim can choose to help the defendant in a legal case by providing information or testimony that may support the defendant's case. However, it is important to note that the victim's decision to help the defendant is voluntary and not required.
Yes, it was a difficult decision for Atticus to make because he had to choose between upholding his principles and facing potential backlash from his community. Atticus understood the moral gravity of his decision and the impact it could have on his family and his reputation as a lawyer.
No they are not allowed to both, they must choose between the two.
Atticus reacts with disapproval to the scheme, recognizing its moral ambiguity and the potential harm it could cause to others. He values honesty and integrity, and does not support actions that involve deceit or manipulation. Ultimately, Atticus encourages his children to always choose the path of honesty and fairness.
They are things around her house.
selena gomez is the best
A defense attorney might choose not to call the defendant to the stand to avoid the risk of the defendant providing damaging testimony that could undermine their case. The defendant's credibility may be questioned, or they might inadvertently reveal information that could be detrimental to their defense. Additionally, the attorney may feel that the prosecution has not met its burden of proof, making the defendant's testimony unnecessary. Ultimately, the decision is strategic, focusing on the overall strength of the defense case.
Both parties choose the jury. In many cases prospective jurors will be asked to answer a series of questions. Both sides can then interview jurors and each gets to reject or accept them.
A spouse or civil partner of a defendant is almost always considered a competent witness for either side, and may choose to testify for or against their spouse. A defendant may, when relevant, compel their spouse or civil partner to testify on their behalf. The prosecution however, may only compel the testimony of the defendant's spouse or civil partner in cases of domestic abuse or violence or sexual offences towards persons under 16. When the spouse or civil partner is a co-defendant to the charges, they may not be compelled to testify. ~wikipedia.org/wiki/Spousal_privilege