To put it simply, no. The Communist Mannifesto and personal writings do not seem to argue that society should have a centrally planned economy.
Actually, the closest thing that he discusses about this subject is with guilds. A guild is an organisation of professional individuals; carpenters, shoe-makers, masons, bankers, etc. Individuals joined them to have collective power and from there they would agree how much should be produced, how it must be produced, who is excluded and included in the guild. A sort of planned economy if you will. It was a profession that could be passed down from generation to generation.
Marx did not have a positive view of guilds because in his mind they created inefficiency and did not allow capitalism to fully develop or continue improving Man's progress. Guilds constrained the advancement of capitalism. We could therefore believe that he did not believe there should be a centrally planned economy. It is not much but it probably is the closest thing you can get.
This question might often get confused because when he speaks of a central power he is referring to mid-19th century Germany when there was no State of Germany, only German cities/provinces/states. Marx is proposing a Unified German State, not a centrally planned economy nor for a state to impose a centrally planned economy.
In today life, the economy is bad because some people don't have jobs or any money to survive their surroundings and their bills.The word economy is a noun. A sentence for economy is, 'They argued about whether or not tax cuts were good for the overall economy.'
Mainly, the Wealth of Nations is about the benefits of a free market economy and how the government should leave economic decisions to individual households and firms without regulation or intervention because it is argued to be more productive and beneficial for society.
John Maynard Keynes
Adam smith
In times of scarcity, a command economy can use rationing, but then, it could be argued that any time rationing is used, that is a form of command economy. In better economic circumstances, command economies just use money. Since a command economy controls how much money everybody has, money then serves almost the same function as a ration coupon.
Karl Marx argued that everything in society, including culture, politics, and institutions, is ultimately determined by economic factors. According to Marx, the economic system shapes all other aspects of society.
Karl Marx believed that the economic system, specifically the mode of production, was the foundation of society. He argued that the relationship between the means of production and the social structures shaped the development of human history and class struggle.
Rousseau argued that society should be governed by the general will, which represents the common interests of the people. He believed that individuals should participate in direct democracy to shape the laws and policies that govern them, creating a society based on collaboration and equality.
actively plan the economy
actively plan the economy
Emile Durkheim argued that deviance has benefits for society as it helps to clarify societal norms and boundaries, promote social change and innovation, and strengthen social cohesion through the collective reaction to deviant behavior.
the classical economists
This not a question, so I don't know how to answer it.
Karl Marx believed that society should transition from capitalism to socialism, where the means of production are owned and controlled by the workers. He envisioned a classless society where resources are distributed according to need, rather than profit. Marx argued that this would lead to a more equal and just society for all.
humans had natural rights.
Humans had natural rights
They argued that slavery contributed to the prosperous economy.