Yes
Weber believed that social change is influenced by a variety of factors, including culture, ideas, and individual actions, while Marx focused primarily on economic factors such as class struggle and ownership of the means of production. Their differing emphasis led to disagreements about the central forces driving social change.
Weber believed that the central force in social change was the rationalization of society through the increasing dominance of bureaucracy and the rise of capitalism. He argued that this shift towards rationality and efficiency would lead to an iron cage of bureaucracy that would shape and control individual behavior.
Jennifer Patico has written: 'Consumption, values, and social change in a post-Soviet middle class' -- subject(s): Consumption (Economics), Economic conditions, Middle class, Professional employees, Social aspects, Social aspects of Consumption (Economics), Social change, Social conditions, Standard of living
Two central concepts in Marx's theory of social change are class struggle and historical materialism. Marx believed that history is shaped by the conflict between social classes and that changes in society are driven by conflicts over resources and power. Historical materialism is the idea that the economic base of a society, such as the means of production and who controls them, determines the social and political structures that emerge.
economics is a social science
According to Karl Marx, the engine of social change is class struggle. Marx believed that conflicts between different economic classes, particularly between the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production) and the proletariat (working class), would lead to revolutionary change and the eventual establishment of a classless society.
true
Economics is a social science and its important our social life,political life economics and daily life.its based on the piler of country..
Economics is a social science.
economics is a science of scarcity
karl marx