Yes he did after he destroyed their culture religion
The Inca people likely viewed Pizarro as an invader and conqueror who threatened their way of life and sovereignty. They probably saw him and his soldiers as a force of destruction that brought about the downfall of their civilization.
Francisco Pizarro, Diego de Almargo and a force of Spanish Conquistadors.
It isn't bad. The only people who are against freedom of religion are intolerant people, who would like to force everybody to follow their own religious beliefs.
The Incas were a well civilized race, however they still had their downfalls. The man who conquered this fierce tribe was Pizarro. He didn't just conquer them with pure force though. Before Pizarro arrived a great civil war had occurred, leaving the Inca military weak, which made it easy for Pizarro to destroy them. Pizarro had taken Atahualpa, the Incan leader, captive. The incas bribed Pizarro with a room filled with gold for Atahualpa, however once Pizarro received it he still ordered that Atahualpa to be killed. It took Pizarro approximately 40 more years until the last Inca was killed, his name was Tupac Amaru, Pizarro ordered that his body be dismembered to stop any further Inca resistance.
Francisco Pizarro was known for being a Spanish conquistador who led the conquest of the Inca Empire in South America. He was determined, ruthless, and cunning in his tactics, which allowed him to defeat the Inca Empire with a relatively small force. Pizarro was also driven by a desire for wealth and power, seeking to exploit the riches of the Inca Empire.
Nature
Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in South America, while Hernando Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in Mexico. Pizarro's conquest led to the establishment of the Viceroyalty of Peru, while Cortes' conquest led to the establishment of New Spain. Their tactics and approaches to conquest differed, with Pizarro relying more on political maneuvering and alliances, while Cortes used military force and alliances with indigenous groups.
A:Generally no. Just as the pagan Romans considered Christianity a mere superstition when they first made contact with Christians, so did European explorers typically regard the beliefs of people they met as mere superstitions. Every effort was made to teach the people Christianity. Force was sometimes used, but in other cases ridicule of the ancient beliefs could be just as effective.
no never it can never be okay for people as it is their choice to follow their religion not others choice that they would listen to me as i say and force them to follow it,and also we dont have a right have a force people for what we say and they do it. i would never be a peson who would be forcing people would you?so never force it can cause wars, accidents and evilness for each other. let people what they want to do and you follow your religion. as i am a hindu i would like to follow that only so no one can force me.
Francisco Pizarro had a small force of around 168 men during his conquest of the Inca Empire in the early 16th century. This contingent included infantry and cavalry, which was relatively small compared to the vast Inca armies they faced. Despite their numerical disadvantage, Pizarro's men utilized superior weaponry, strategic alliances, and the element of surprise to achieve victory.
Pizarro's treatment of the Incas mirrored Cortés's treatment of the Aztecs in their use of military force, deception, and manipulation to achieve conquest. Both leaders capitalized on internal divisions within these empires, employing tactics such as forming alliances with rival factions. They also exploited the indigenous peoples' beliefs, presenting themselves as superior figures, which facilitated their control. Additionally, both conquistadors engaged in brutal violence and significant resource extraction, leading to devastating impacts on the native populations.
Francisco Pizarro initially had around 180 soldiers when he embarked on his conquest of the Inca Empire in the early 1530s. This force was relatively small compared to the vast Inca army, but Pizarro's men were equipped with superior weaponry and armor, alongside horses, which gave them a significant tactical advantage. Over time, he was able to recruit additional allies, including native groups opposed to the Incas.