hell no
Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964)The Petitioner, Reynolds, was Dallas County, Alabama, Probate Judge Bernard A. Reynolds.
not you
The U.S. Supreme Court case decision in 1964 that ordered all states to organize their upper house senate by population rather than by county is Reynolds v. Sims. The court ruled that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population to ensure fair and equal representation for all citizens. This decision had a significant impact on the structure of state legislatures across the country.
The Supreme Court decisions in Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims resulted in more equal representation. In Reynolds v. Sims, the court stated that state legislature districts had to be approximately equal in terms of population.
The political question in Baker v. Carr, (1962) was whether the US Supreme Court could interfere with the legislative branch of government to decide how voter apportionment maps could be drawn.The Supreme Court abandoned its position that voting district apportionment was a political question because the states (Tennessee, in this case) failed to draw district lines in a way that guaranteed equal representation to all voters. Bakerwas soon followed by two other cases addressing legislative representation, Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964) and Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964).Case Citation:Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962)
Reynolds v. Sims.
Lyndon B. Johnson
Reynolds and Sims!
Urban Areas.
Reynolds vs. sims
Reyonald vs. Sims
Reynolds v. Sims established the "one man, one vote" rule (also called "one person, one vote") that held state political districts of unequal size resulted in under-representation of some citizens' interests and over-representation of others'. This was considered "unrepublican," per Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, and unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In order to meet constitutional standards, districts had to be reapportioned so each had approximately equal population.Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 US 1 (1964), a case heard slightly earlier the same year as Reynolds, applied the equal apportionment principle to Districts of the US House of Representatives.Both the Wesberry and Reynolds decisions were predicated on the landmark ruling in Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 (1962), in which the US Supreme Court decided reapportionment of state legislative districts was not a "political question" that should be resolved through legislation. The Court found legislative conflicts of interest raised justiciable issues that could be addressed and resolved by the Federal courts.Case Citation:Reynolds v. Sims, 377 US 533 (1964)For more information, see Related Questions, below.