Yes, they had a very advanced one for their time.
In ancient Rome the men who fought were either the military or the gladiators.
No, no, and no. Gladiators had nothing to do with the military unless they happened to be prisoners of war. Military heroes were honored and held in high esteem in ancient Rome. The gladiators were at the bottom of society.
Alexander the Great had nothing to do with ancient Rome. He was a Macedonian king and military leader. His conquests were east, while Rome was in the west.
No way
A major victory (over 5,000 enemy dead on the battlefield) might be rewarded by a Triumph (a triumphal procession through the city with army, spoils and the vanquished leader, followed by religious ceremony, strangling of the vanquished leader and a feast).A lesser victory might be rewarded by an Ovation in the Senate.
A paludamentum is a military cloak worn by a general and his principal officers in Ancient Rome.
The military age in ancient Rome was 17 to 46. The Marian reforms of 107 BC established a military career of 16 years. Later it was extended to 20 and 25 years.
Yes they did in Ancient Greece and Rome. If you look at Ancient Greek temples or pottery you will see the gorgon and with Rome you can see the gorgon on military armour, specifically.
Ancient Rome did not have a flag for the country. The only flags that they used were the military standards, the signum or the vexillum.
The soldiers swore an oath of loyalty to the emperor.
An armilla is a military decoration in Ancient Rome, or a ring of hair or feathers found on the legs of animals.
The most direct and brief answer is that the superior military forces of ancient Rome conquered and / or subdued ancient Greece.