Of course they did. Look them up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_battles
Yes, most of the battles the Romans fought had names. That's so that historians, both ancient and modern, could let us know what tactics or battle stats that they were discussing. Most of the battles were named after the city or area where they were fought, such as the battles of Alesia, Pharsales, Actiuim, etc.
No, the Romans did not engage in battles with the Vikings during their time.
key battles are the names of the battles this by me
The Romans won hundreds of wars during their 1,200 years ofhistory.
2456 and lost 10
they did
Yes, the Romans made chariots. However, they did not use them for battles.
Of course they did. Look them up here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_battles
Yes, the Romans used cavalry in their battles. Most were auxiliary troops commanded by a Roman officer. Their position was on the wings or edges of the infantry and the Romans won many battles due to the efforts of their cavalry.
Romans had many entertainment, the most common would be watching gladiator battles.
they know which way to go
Julius Ceaser had won most of their battles.