yes. because of the 13th admendment and also the case of dred Scott vs. Stanford
because they didn't want to be slaves any more
Slaves owned by Africans were sometimes given more rights, better treatment, and opportunities for integration into society, such as the possibility of marrying into the owner's family or achieving freedom. In comparison, slaves owned by Europeans were often subjected to harsher conditions, faced higher levels of brutality, and had limited chances for social mobility or freedom.
The slaves' freedom was denied by the concept that slaves were property, not human beings, and all human beings are free, but not property, so slaves were denied freedom due to the concept that slaves were property, not people.
They wanted to have freedom.
Freedom for slaves meant that the slaves didn't have to be owned and that they could be treated like everybody else.
former slaves envision freedom from few former slaves were able to own land
They wanted slaves to revolt and fight for their freedom.
In Muslim society, slaves could gain their freedom by buying their freedom. Additionally, female slaves could gain freedom by marrying a Muslim owner.
In Muslim society, slaves could gain their freedom by buying their freedom. Additionally, female slaves could gain freedom by marrying a Muslim owner.
slaves found freedom in ?
What year did the slaves follow the underground railroad to freedom
Personal liberty laws:- Laws passed by north states forbidding the imprisonment of escaped slaves.