No. There is a great deal wrong with your question. First, in the 1700-1800's there was no world war. Second the colonists were only concerned about survival and creation of a society.
After the Spaniards, various European powers such as the Dutch, British, and French began establishing colonies in different parts of the world. This period marked the era of European colonial expansion and dominance.
During World War I, several empires lost their colonies as a result of territorial changes and treaties. The Ottoman Empire, for example, lost much of its territory in the Middle East, while Germany lost its overseas colonies in Africa and the Pacific. The war led to significant shifts in colonial power, ultimately contributing to the rise of new nations and the reconfiguration of colonial holdings in the years that followed.
American pressure, financial as much as anything. Aid during the war was often contingent on the abandonment of empire after it. Also the perceived weakness of pre-war colonial powers during the war made the colonised peoples disinclined to accept the inevitability of colonial rule. Sometimes (eg the British in India) concessions were made to colonised peoples to secure their support during the war.
france and great britain.
Colonial people played a significant role in World War I by providing essential manpower and resources to their colonial powers. Millions of soldiers from colonies, such as those in Africa, India, and the Caribbean, were recruited to fight in various theaters of war, often in harsh conditions. Additionally, colonial territories supplied raw materials and agricultural products that were crucial for sustaining the war effort. This involvement also fueled nationalist sentiments in many colonies, contributing to post-war movements for independence.
During World War II, the Axis powers were defeated.
The European powers were devastated by WW II and it took years to rebuild their economies and infrastructure (with the help of the US). They were in no condition to control a colonial empire. In addition, the European colonies had also been affected by the war and no longer believed the mythology about the superiority and advantages of European culture and civilization, which had brough the world to such disaster. WW II was very educational, and the colonies were not about to just go back to the way things used to be.
The British capital of the New World during the colonial period was Williamsburg, Virginia. It served as the capital of the Virginia Colony from 1699 until 1780, playing a crucial role in the political and cultural life of the time. Williamsburg was a center for colonial governance, education, and commerce, significantly influencing the development of the American colonies.
wanted to be the most powerful.
The answer to the question is Germany. Germany was not one of the Allied Powers during World War 1. The Allied Powers during World War 1 were: Russia The US France
i do not think so... the great powers from Western Europe had colonies (like France, England, Holland and so on).. i think a country must be a naval power and also to have a strong army to be able to have colonies, which Bulgaria was not. And the run for colonies started much earlier before Bulgaria was independent (1878) my opinion: Bulgaria did not have colonies
The devastation and expense of the world wars significantly weakened European powers, leading to a wave of decolonization across Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean. Many colonies sought independence, fueled by rising nationalist movements and the desire for self-determination. The economic strain on colonial powers made it increasingly difficult to maintain control over distant territories, resulting in a rapid dismantling of colonial empires in the mid-20th century. Consequently, numerous new nations emerged, reshaping the global political landscape.