No, they were kind of insignificant. Since the fighting was done mostly in trenches, the opposing forces never really got close enough for a flamethrower to be useful.
First World War.
around the end a few years after the tank
-37
flamethrowers, gas masks and posion gas, graneds,submarines and torpedos.
World War II, Korean and Vietnam Wars,
England won so theres your answer
The exact number of deaths caused by flamethrowers in World War I is difficult to determine, as detailed records on specific weapon-related fatalities were not consistently kept. However, it is estimated that flamethrowers were responsible for a relatively small number of deaths compared to other weapons, with some reports suggesting that they killed several hundred soldiers during the conflict. Flamethrowers were primarily used for clearing trenches and bunkers, rather than as a primary weapon of mass destruction.
It was Germany that first used flamethrowers as weapons in World War I.
A World War II veteran. The US military doesn't issue flamethrowers anymore. In addition to the above, it should be noted that flamethrowers were used in Korea and Vietnam, as well.
Wireless telegraphy was a major communications advancement during World War I. It allowed for communications between land and sea vessels.
The flamethrower was used by various armies during World War I, primarily by the Germans and the Allies, but its overall effectiveness in terms of casualties is difficult to quantify. Estimates suggest that flamethrowers caused several thousand deaths, but precise figures are not well-documented. Their psychological impact on troops was significant, as they instilled fear and terror on the battlefield. Overall, while they contributed to the war's brutality, flamethrowers were not the primary weapon of mass casualties.
radioField telephones