Another answer from our community:
Luke was Paul's physician and travelling companion. Since Paul never saw Jesus personally (only in a vision), then it's unlikely that Luke saw Jesus personally.
Almost all of the gospels reutedly written at or about the time of Jesus' life and death were actually written much later - the earliest was written almost fifty years later; it is extremely unlikely that anybody who personally knew (or even met) Jesus was still around at that time.
A:
We do not know whether the author of Luke's Gospel met any of the apostles who had known Jesus, simply because we do not know who the author was. The fact is that the gospel now known as Luke's Gospel was originally anonymous, until attributed to Luke the physician and companion of Paul, by the Church Fathers later in the second century. That attribution was speculative and is in any case unlikely to have been true, since the third gospel was written around the end of the first century.
The introduction to the gospel indicates the author knew no one close to Jesus, or even to Paul. Luke 1:2 says that the gospel contains what was handed down over time, beginning with those who the author believed to have been eyewitnesses. We now know that the sources handed down to this author were Mark's Gospel and the hypothetical 'Q' document.
There is no suggestion anywhere in The Bible that either Paul or his companion, Luke, ever met Jesus.
The attribution of the Gospel of Luke is also considered unlikely to be true: the Gospel was originally anonymous and was only attributed to Luke later in the second century, largely because the Church Fathers were looking for an educated man who must have known Paul, and decided that Luke was the only possible candidate they knew. Whoever did write Luke's Gospel clearly did not know Jesus, because he copied much of Mark's Gospel, often in exactly the same words in the Greek language Luke also relies heavily on the hypothetical 'Q' document. It was written in the 90s of the first century or very early in the second century, much too late for a contemporary of Jesus.
In all probability, yes, as a man alive in Israel at the time of Christ. But the Bible never states this directly.
yes they were best friends
no
Jesus Said to forgive them. Luke 23:24 Father,Forgive them for they do not know what they do.
By reading through the Biblical accounts in Matthew, Mark, and Luke.
Jesus performed 19 miracles in Luke.
A:According to Luke's Gospel, Jesus was related to John the Baptist. His mother Mary was the cousin of John's mother Elizabeth. There are several reasons to doubt this, including that John's Gospel says that the Baptist did not even know Jesus.
book of luke
Luke is emphasizing the characters and of course Jesus .
Luke 23:34 Then Jesus said, "Father, forgive them they know not what they do."
to Herod (Luke 23:7 )
The Bible doesn't tell us exactly if they did or did not. The gospel of Luke tells us some women who had had spirits cast out of them went around with Jesus and His disciples - Luke 8: 1-3. But after Jesus was resurrected - we don't know
Judas led the guards to Jesus, intending to betray him with a kiss. Jesus stopped him saying "Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?" Luke 22:47.
We now know that the author of Luke's Gospel, as with the author of Matthew's Gospel, relied on Mark's Gospel for his information about the life and mission of Jesus, supplementing this with sayings from the 'Q' document.When Luke copies Mark, it usually does so reasonably accurately, but the last words of Jesus given by Luke are very different than those given by Mark. According to Mark's Gospel Jesus said, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me," just before he died. But in Luke's Gospel, Jesus said, "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit." The significance of this is that Mark's words portray an unwillingness to die in this manner and the thought that God has let Jesus down. When Luke replaces this, it becomes an almost triumphant passing of Jesus from this earth into the hands of his Father. This is a magnificant reversal that demonstrates some of the genius of Luke.We also now know that the author of John's Gospel used Luke's Gospel as his major source on Jesus, so we can expect John to follow Luke. But John differs from both Mark and Luke, with Jesus saying, "It is finished." The significance here is that for John, Jesus was both divine and pre-existing, so the author saw Luke's wording as inappropriate for a Son who is returning to his Father after completing an earthly assignment. "It is finished" gave Jesus the nonchalance and near-equality to God the Father that met John's portrayal of Jesus.
I don't know which blessing that you're referring to, but the books with the words of Jesus are found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.