Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
they lived in houses made of bricks and mud
No, most Roman houses were stone floors, however some could afford a mosaic floor, but not carpets.
Because their were poor people and rich people too so the rich people had more furniture than the poor people
Depends. If you were poor you would have a small brick house whereas the wealthy could have houses as big as palaces.
rich peoples houses were very beautifully built and they were made of pure carved stone with horse hair as cement but it actually worked A poor persons house was very different because most poor houses were very badly built with rotten woods and sometimes even stones with no cement and inside the rich homes was comfy furniture and lovely wallpaper but inside a poor home there would be poor light and damp conditions with maybe a wooden stool and a bit of linen with hay stuffed underneath.
Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
for houses and furniture
The differences between the poor houses and the rich houses were that the poor houses did not have fancy rooms or anything like that and the rich houses had store room lovely kitchen they had much better things then the poor houses
they had moon-pig furniture
The Roman houses of the rich were by and large much more spacious than the Roman houses of the poor. Rich Romans also had more amenities in their homes such as a water source. Poor Romans would have had to obtain their water for daily use such as cleaning and bathing from a public fountain.
Roman bath houses where used to clean themselves. They were public to all but separated by genders. They (normally) had to pay each time they took a bath. Also the rich people went more often than the poor people.
The Roman houses were built in the city of Rome and in all the towns the Roman built around the Roman Empire, especially in Italy. The Romans also built houses on their farms.
The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.The bath houses in Roman towns were used for getting clean and socializing.