Rich roman Girls would not have gone to school but her father would have paid a tutor to teach her
Rich roman Girls would not have gone to school but her father would have paid a tutor to teach her
No, only boys from very rich families would go to school. Girls from rich families would be taught at home. There were no schools for the poor unless you entered the church as a monk.
the gallagr girls series is about girls who go to the gallagher academy for exceptional young women. people think its a school for rich snobs but it really a school for spies
Some schools in Egypt are mixed gender schools and some of them are separate
no
All males, females, slaves, rich, and poor, were required to go to school and enrolled. Ancient Mexican socialized schooling for all.
Tudor girls didn't go to school but some girls were taught by their mothers at home. It was mainly the very rich ones who where home tutored.
There was no school for girls.
Because poor boys did have the money to go to school and girls had to prepare for weddings they got married while young because they didn't live long
No, Girls Couldn't go to school because, girls had to learn how to work in the house.
well in italy the girls didn't go to school
Yes, indeed roman girls did go to school. Wealthy or rich girls went to school at the age of seven. Poor girls didnt go to school. Wealthy girls learned how to spin, weave, and sew. j s v