Serfs did not own land. In fact they were bound to the land they lived on and were not permitted to leave it.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
When Alexander II freed the serfs (peasants) in Russia in 1861. The serfs were never truly freed. The Russian government bought land from the landowners to give to the serfs, but the serfs were required to repay the Russian government. These repayments took 49 years and the serfs stayed on the land until it was fully repaid.
Knight
Freemen were tenants. While they were permitted to leave the land, unlike serfs, they did not own land. Land ownership was dependent ultimately on the king, and was a clear indicator of status as a gentleman or lady.
Yes, an aristocrat would give serfs land in an agreement that the serf would protect the lord.
the vassals would give protection to the serfs and also protect the land
No they were slaves. Slaves don't own land.
people who worked the land were serfs and peasant witch were mostly serfs.Nobles gave the serfs some land and in return the serf would farm and protect there land for them.
land
Serfs didn't own land. They were slaves, so your answer is never.