sadly, yes. it was thought that it was better to get as much work out of the slave before it died. there was no need seen to treat a sick slave when one could be bought or a child would soon be ready to work
Yes. Because back then slaves werent treated like human beings.
No, not at all. Slaves were expected to work whether they were healthy or sick.
Sabotaging equipment or tools, pretending to be sick or injured, or deliberately working slowly are examples of passive resistance that slaves used to disrupt the system of slavery without directly confronting their oppressors.
an example of passive resistance used by slaves is feigning illness or working slowly in the fields to resist their oppressors without outright defiance.
People hurt slaves in various ways, including physical abuse such as whipping, beating, and torture. They also subjected slaves to psychological abuse by dehumanizing them, restricting their freedoms, and perpetuating a system of fear and control. Slaves were also often denied basic human rights, such as proper nutrition, healthcare, and living conditions.
Pretending to be sick to avoid work.
Some of the passive resistance tactics employed by slaves included feigning illness, breaking tools, working slowly, and pretending ignorance. These actions aimed to disrupt the plantation system, slow down productivity, and resist the demands of their enslavers without direct confrontation. By utilizing these tactics, slaves were able to assert a degree of autonomy and resist the oppressive conditions of slavery.
If the slaves were sick, they would usually be thrown offboard and left to swim. This is because no-one would want to buy the sick slaves.
There are still slaves today.
It is a compound sentence.
Slaves owners could use brutal force by beating their slaves into submission or they would simply be kind to their slaves while still enforcing a good work ethic.
from when the slaves rebelled and got tired of your work you all fat sick me dont know me dummy you arr vas legas