Frederick Douglass stands as an iconic figure in American history, having risen from the depths of slavery to become a leading abolitionist and a powerful advocate for civil rights. Born around 1818 in Maryland as a slave, Douglass endured the harsh realities of bondage but managed to escape to freedom in 1838. His early life experiences fueled his determination to fight against the institution of slavery, and he became a prominent voice in the abolitionist movement.

Douglass's remarkable journey from slavery to activism is vividly captured in his autobiography, "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave." This groundbreaking work not only exposed the brutalities of slavery but also showcased Douglass's eloquence and intellect. His ability to articulate the dehumanizing effects of slavery and the moral imperative of its abolition resonated deeply with audiences, both in the United States and abroad.

As an abolitionist, Douglass used his oratorical skills to engage in public speaking, captivating audiences with his impassioned pleas for the end of slavery. He became a compelling advocate for equal rights, arguing that freedom and citizenship should be extended to all, regardless of race or background. Douglass's commitment to the cause led him to work closely with other abolitionists, including notable figures such as William Lloyd Garrison.

In addition to his activism, Douglass played a key role in the women's suffrage movement, advocating for the rights of women as well. His legacy extends beyond the abolitionist movement, as he continued to influence discussions on civil rights and equality throughout his life. Frederick Douglass's enduring impact lies not only in his personal journey from slavery to freedom but also in his unwavering dedication to justice and his relentless pursuit of a more equitable society.

Denmark Vesey, a carpenter, planned a large-scale slave uprising in and near Charleston, South Carolina, in 1822. The plot was ultimately foiled, leading to his arrest and execution.

for more information, contact us: 045864033

Yes in some ways it still is slavery going on now.

All of the answers are correct, A+ people

social and economic reasons between the south and the north, federal vs state rights and the fight between non-slave and slave state proponents

Slavery has never been a good thing.

Taking into account of what I just said, the only time slavery might be considered a good thing is if in ancient times the choice was being a slave or being killed. In the case of ancient Rome as example, after your nation was defeated by Rome, and you were made a slave ( God forbid ) there might be a chance that one's behavior as a Greek slave tutor, freedom might be offered in due time. This is a stretch however, but in ancient Rome, becoming a freedman was a possibility.

Are you in Stordahl?

many people worked all the time and made barely enough to survive

The African slave trade had a major impact on a limited number of economic activities: mostly the sugar production in the north and east of South America and on the Caribean islands, and the cotton production in the southern US States, which all could not have developed without slave labour. The ecomomies of these lands were all for a while heavily dependent on slave labor.

An often underexposed aspect of the African slave trade was the slave trade by Arab slave traders which lasted for many centuries more than the slave trade by whites. Probably hundreds of thousands of African slaves were over the centuries sold to Middle Eastern and north African countries, whose economy also became heavily dependent on slave labor.

The economy of western African kingdoms also prospered by the slave trade. The European trading posts on the African coast never organized raids for slaves themselves. It was the local African chiefs who found a considerable source of income in either selling their own subjects to European or American slave traders or organizing raids into neighboring areas to round up people to sell to them as slaves.

An important difference between congressional Reconstruction and presidential Reconstruction is the level of power and authority given to the federal government. Congressional Reconstruction, led by Radical Republicans, sought to assert strong federal control over the South to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans. In contrast, presidential Reconstruction, led by President Andrew Johnson, favored a more lenient approach with the states having greater control over their own affairs and offering amnesty to former Confederates.

Northerners believed that the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was unfair because they opposed the institution of slavery and saw it as a violation of basic human rights. They felt that the law required them to participate in the enforcement and return of escaped slaves, even if they did not agree with slavery or believe in its legality. Additionally, the act denied alleged fugitive slaves the right to a trial by jury, which was seen as a violation of the principles of due process.

The slave master typically referred to the slave as "slave" or by their given name. However, it is important to note that slaves were often dehumanized and derogatory terms were used to degrade and demean them.

Bartolomé de Las Casas did not advocate for the enslavement of Africans in Spain. In fact, he was strongly opposed to the enslavement and mistreatment of indigenous people in the Spanish colonies as well. Las Casas proposed the idea of importing African slaves instead of using indigenous people as a means to protect the rights and well-being of the indigenous populations.

The use of slaves dates back to ancient times and can be traced back thousands of years. Slavery was prevalent in various societies and civilizations, including ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, and throughout the Islamic world, as well as in Africa, the Americas, and other regions. It is important to note that different societies practiced slavery in different ways and for different purposes.

There were instances where some Africans participated in the enslavement of their own people primarily through the involvement in the transatlantic slave trade. Factors like economic incentives, intertribal conflicts, and coerced alliances with European colonizers contributed to this participation. Additionally, some African groups may have initially viewed the Europeans as allies rather than enslavers, leading to their involvement in the capture and sale of slaves. However, it is essential to note that the African participation in the slave trade was not representative of the entire continent but rather a complex and varied phenomenon.

African slaves were forcibly captured and traded by Europeans to work on plantations and in mines in the Americas. They were seen as property and were sold and transported across the Atlantic as part of the transatlantic slave trade. Their labor and exploitation were central to the economic success of European colonies in the Americas.

Republican Abraham Lincoln and southern Democrat John C. Breckinridge -Novanet

Many enslaved people were forced to work on plantations, primarily in industries such as agriculture (cotton, tobacco, rice, sugar cane) and domestic labor. Some also worked in industries such as mining, construction, and manufacturing.

Slavery played a significant role in westward expansion in the United States. The expansion of slavery into new territories and states fueled sectional tensions between the North and South, eventually leading to the American Civil War. The issue of whether new states would allow or prohibit slavery was a major factor in determining the balance of power between the free and slave states, and ultimately the course of westward expansion.

One example of someone who was not an advocate for the abolition of slavery was John C. Calhoun. Calhoun was a prominent southern politician who vehemently defended slavery and argued for its preservation. He believed that slavery was a positive good and essential for the southern economy and way of life.

The African slave trade was primarily driven by economic factors. The demand for labor in the Americas, particularly in industries such as sugar, tobacco, and cotton, led to a need for a large workforce. European colonial powers, particularly Portugal, Spain, Britain, and France, established a system of capturing or purchasing enslaved Africans and transporting them across the Atlantic Ocean for forced labor. Additionally, social and cultural factors, including racism and notions of racial superiority, also played a role in justifying and perpetuating the slave trade.

When the cotton gin was invented it gave cotton growers a way to grow more cotton. More cotton meant more slaves, and more slaves meant more production. With production going that meant more could be sold and that also means more money. Money gave the plantation owners riches beyond belief and they lived very well off the slave labor. About the same time in England the spinning cotton Jenny was invented so they needed the cotton the south grew. The conjunction of all of these things gave the southern plantation society unlimited power. When the civil war started they thought England would help them because they needed the imported cotton, but the English where houses were full of bales of cotton.

Most African slaves originally came from regions in West and Central Africa, including present-day countries such as Senegal, Gambia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Ghana, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Angola, and Mozambique.

Slaves referred to Harriet Tubman as "Moses" because she led them to freedom, much like the biblical figure who led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt.

Egypt has a high population due to several factors. Firstly, it is a historically and culturally rich country with a long-standing civilization, attracting a steady influx of people over the centuries. Additionally, the fertile Nile River Valley provides favorable conditions for agriculture and settlement. Lastly, there has been a lack of effective population control measures and limited access to education and healthcare in the past, which have contributed to population growth.