yes because Lauren made it happen
How the hell am i suppose to know.
yes because Lauren made it happen
Study shows that there was an impact on both the West Indies and on West Africa. The impact on West Africa for the most part was just negative, while the West Indies received alot of positive impacts due to the factor : Slavery. West Africa suffered a population decrease, while due to slavery the West Indies' population was increasing. Since the Europeans were trading with the Africans, the Africans were getting guns and other weapons which caused them to lower their values because they were killing up their own people in tribal wars, while the Europeans were trading the African for slaves that they used as laborers on their plantations to make themselves wealthier. In conclusion, I have found out that slavery has had an impact on both West Africa and the West Indies. However, the impact in the Americas or West Indies was positive, while the impact was negative for the Africans of West Africa.
closest to africa. the sugar cane trade.
Slavery made the plantation owners rich. Africans were a great source of cheap labor. However they were treated horribly.http://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/ism/slavery/archaeology/caribbean/
rum
During slavery, some of them came directly from Africa...West and Central Africa. For example: My gullah descendants are from the West Indies, Mandinka, and Yoruba tribe. Others came from the West indies. So we are a mixture of African and West Indian. Slave Traders went to Africa first, travel through the West Indies (they stop there as well), and stop in South Carolina. They live in the Sea Islands of South Carolina and Georgia.
They didn't trade anything. Slaves were brought from Africa to the West Indies
The sugar plantation needed labor in abolition of slavery. This is in West Indies.
What were the economic reason the framers avoided the slvaery question
Africa
they used slavery