The Germans had superior tanks but the allies had numerical superiority. The allies tanks were also faster and more maneuverable, but had less firepower and were easier to destroy. On the western front, no comparison.....German tanks were far superior to anything the British/Americans put out. Three German tanks could take out ten American tanks without suffering a single casualty. Trouble was, Germany lacked air power and fuel, so this huge potential advantage was negated. On the Russian front, it is more complex. The Russian T34 was an excellent tank and just coming into major production late summer 1941. The T34 was hardly perfect however. Advantages would be speed, traction, sloped armor, handling, and mass production ability. Disadvantages were rate of fire due to crew members having multiple jobs and lack of communications. The German tank forces excelled at command and control. Thus the German huge victories on the open steppe. The Russian tanks, well made, lacked this command and control ability and generally had to rely on numerical advantage/mass. This situation is, to me, similar to the British advantage over the Spanish Armada. The Spanish had large, well built ships with lots of firepower. The English had smaller, more nimble ships that could out manuever the Spanish. Ultimately the English won. Of course, Germany lost but that is more due to lack of air cover and fuel as noted above. Also, the combined Allied armies produced probably three tanks for every one the Germans produced. Hard to beat those kind of numbers, whatever your qualitative advantage.
During the Battle of the Bulge, the Germans aimed to capture the American fuel depots to secure a vital supply of gasoline for their armored divisions. This fuel was crucial for powering tanks and vehicles, enabling them to sustain their offensive operations and exploit any breakthroughs. By seizing these resources, the Germans hoped to enhance their mobility and effectiveness in the counteroffensive against Allied forces.
They were both the axis powers last gambles to stop and destroy the advancing allied forces but were defeated the Japanese lost the rest of their carriers and lost some of their best battleships and cruisers. The Germans lost many of their best tanks and crews in Bulge.
Pegasus bridge was on the left of the allied invasion and so its capture prevented the Germans counterattacking into the allied flank. it also allowed troops advancing from the bridge to reach and relive the paras attacking the mereville batteries.
I don't know what you mean by "blow up tanks," but I think the tanks blew stuff up =P
Britain did this in East Anglia to convince the Germans that the Allied invasion would happen at the narrowest part of the English Channel, landing around Calais. The ruse worked and the Germans held thousands of troops and tanks ready to repel an invasion near Calais that never happened.
Tanks were used in World War 1 and the Allied tanks were better equipped than the germans' although the germans' were bigger and i think they were faster the Allied tanks were superior to their enemies' WW1 was when tanks were used in large scale for the first time but i think they were invented some time before the war but not long before. hope that helps!!! :-)
During World War II, Allied forces destroyed approximately 17,000 German tanks. This figure includes tanks lost in various battles across the European theater, as well as those abandoned or captured. The destruction of these tanks played a significant role in the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany.
In World War 2, tanks were mainly used in the European theatre. In the European theatre, the Allies used tanks mainly for attacking and reinforcing infantry, whereas, with the clever Germans, they used Tanks as single divisions, offence and defence (defending the area they conquered during World War 2. along with this the Germans used tanks to weaken the Allied defences very quickly.
During the Battle of the Bulge, the Germans aimed to capture the American fuel depots to secure a vital supply of gasoline for their armored divisions. This fuel was crucial for powering tanks and vehicles, enabling them to sustain their offensive operations and exploit any breakthroughs. By seizing these resources, the Germans hoped to enhance their mobility and effectiveness in the counteroffensive against Allied forces.
General Patton used tanks effectively against the German tanks, but overall, German tanks were better armoured, and had better guns than any thing the allies had late in the war. Sheer numbers were the deciding factor. The allies were able to produce ten times the tanks the Germans produced.
They were both the axis powers last gambles to stop and destroy the advancing allied forces but were defeated the Japanese lost the rest of their carriers and lost some of their best battleships and cruisers. The Germans lost many of their best tanks and crews in Bulge.
The Germans definitely had better weapons, particularly their tanks and rifles. They had many other problems that ultimately caused their defeat.
The Germans has 2,928 tanks. Whereas the Soviets had 5,128 tanks.
Britain did this in East Anglia to convince the Germans that the Allied invasion would happen at the narrowest part of the English Channel, landing around Calais. The ruse worked and the Germans held thousands of troops and tanks ready to repel an invasion near Calais that never happened.
i think probably a cuple thousand
Pretty much every major allied and axis country with the acception of China used tanks in World War 2. The main countries which used tanks on a huge scale were the Germans, Soviets, US and Britain.
It got Allied Armies back in Europe. Within a month,the Allied forces had over a million soldiers and 600 tanks challenging the Wehrmacht. This was an incredible achievement and changed the course of WW2.