No.
No.
No.
In 1763, following the conclusion of the French and Indian War, the English believed that a standing army was necessary to maintain control over Native American tribes and prevent further conflicts. However, the British government faced challenges in effectively managing and pacifying these diverse groups, as many tribes resisted colonial encroachment on their lands. The reliance on a standing army also revealed tensions between colonial interests and British authority, as colonists often viewed military presence as oppressive rather than protective. Ultimately, the belief in the army's effectiveness was complicated by the realities of frontier dynamics and indigenous resistance.
The English generally believed that their army could control Native American populations through military strength and strategic alliances. However, this belief was often challenged by the resilience and adaptability of Indigenous groups, who employed various tactics to resist English encroachments. The English underestimating the complexity of Indigenous societies contributed to misunderstandings and conflicts. Ultimately, while they sought dominance, the reality of control was far more complicated.
Standing in the Way of Control was created on 2006-01-24.
Standing in the Way of Control - song - was created on 2007-03-05.
A. the French and English to vanquish the Indians B. the Iroquois Nation to get the Europeans to leave North America C. trading control of the Ohio Valley and the Mississippi River D. the English to use the Indians to chase the French out of North America E. I'm not sure.
They control the chairmanship of all standing committees.
18th century I believe... Spanish control and enslavery of the indians began probably as early as the 1500s though. The battles between the Spanish and the Aztecs and Incas I believe took place in the 1700s.
They didn't.
Indians
by capturing and imprisoning Indians