No. The song "Sunday Bloody Sunday", by U2, illustrates that the religious divisions that animated political conflict were still strong in the late 20th century, 300 years later.
Exclusively political.
no its not
repression of political and religious groups by the Shah
Religious divisions in Tudor England stemmed from King Henry VIII's break from the Catholic Church to establish the Church of England, leading to conflicts between Catholics and Protestants. Successive monarchs, such as Edward VI and Mary I, imposed their religious beliefs on the population, further deepening divisions. Additionally, political power struggles intensified religious tensions during this period.
Civil rights is the political concept that became popular as a result of the glorious revolution. The Glorious revolution occurred in 1688.
Schism or sectarianism can be used as alternative terms for religious divisions.
These writings challenged traditional social, religious, and political values.
It rejected traditional social, religious, and political values.
The spread of Christianity provided local religious leaders - bishops - not political ones. Constantine harnessed the bishops as a secondary means of control to supplement his political control.
The progression of the Enlightenment was hindered by religious resistance, political opposition, and internal divisions among Enlightenment thinkers. Additionally, events such as the French Revolution and the rise of counter-Enlightenment movements also contributed to slowing down its progression.
The two divisions of the population in Mesopotamia were the rulers and the ruled. The rulers consisted of the kings, high-ranking officials, and priests who held political and religious power. The ruled were the common people who worked as farmers, laborers, and artisans.
These writings challenged traditional social, religious, and political values.