At the time the Roe vs Wade decision was handed down, it was not seen as "too political." The political battles have grown up around it over the years.
Sovereignty
yes"the us supreme court justices reflect and support the political agenda
Supreme Court Justices do not necessarily have parties because they do not run for a political seat. The criteria for a supreme court justice has to be someone who is familiar with the law such as a former lawyer. If Supreme Court justices ran on a political platform that could complicate the position they hold because many political parties have money or a platform they run on.
The Supreme Court decided flag desecration involved "expressive" political speech, which they declared an important component of free speech protected by the First Amendment.For more information about Supreme Court decisions on flag burning, see Related Links, below.
The Supreme Court does not use a jury. The Supreme Court is involved in interpretations of the US constitution. A jury would not help.
No. The Supreme Court took off restrictions on political contributions in a ruling in 2013. That is one reason so much money is now involved in political campaigns. The small contributions can not compete with the millions that have come into the system to pay for interest based legislation.
have a law degree!!! apexx (:
have a law degree!!! apexx (:
The failed impeachment attempt reinforced the concept of judicial independence, preserved the separation of powers, demonstrated the system of checks and balances was effective. It also discouraged Supreme Court justices from becoming directly involved in partisan politics, and Congress from attempting to use impeachment as a political weapon in the absence of actions that could be legitimately considered "high crimes and misdemeanors." For more information, see Related Question, below.
The major political party in North Korea is The Supreme Peoples Assembly.
Supreme Court
anonymously