Definitely not. Churchill said that the British would fight at the landing areas, in the fields, in the cities, and would never surrender. He went on to say that in the unlikely event that Britain was successfully invaded, the British would continue the fight against Hitler from her colonies. In short, the British would never surrender, no matter what the cost. If more countries had acted against the Nazis as Britain did, Hitler would not have been so successful as a bully.
no
Them bombing us first.
There would have been NO surrender.
1940
The one dropped on Nagasaki.
It was the measure to make Japan surrender in ww2.
unconditional surrender.
No, Japan didn't immediately refuse after the bombing of Hiroshima. After the bombing, Emperor Hirohito (the Japanese leader during the Second World War) went into consultation with the Imperial War Council (of Japan) where they were deciding whether or not to surrender. However, three days after the bombing of Hiroshima, America bombed Japan again, this time in Nagasaki. Roughly a week after the Nagasaki bombing, Emperor Hirohito on 15 August 1945 announced surrender via radio broadcast. He officially surrendered in written agreement later that year on 2 September 1945.
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
No. The bombing of Pearl Harbor caused the US to enter the war against Japan.
The London bombing did occur in central London. The attack targeted the London Underground.
There was no 'battle of Blitz'- this is probably referring to the Battle of Britain, 10 July 1940 – 31 October 1940, the heaviest bombing of London and other UK cities by the Luftwaffe, and the regular battles between them and the RAF. The Blitz was a nickname for the bombing of London, an abbreviation of 'Blitzkrieg', German for Lightning War.
The heavy and frequent bombing attacks on London and other cities in the UK (eg Coventry and Plymouth) during WW2 was known as the 'Blitz'.