some did
Some Victorians pitied the poor and tried to be charitable to them. However, the prevalent systems in dealing with the poor were based on Malthusian and utilitarian ideals. Basically, Malthusian thought said that the poor reproduced at a rate that would eventually put a strain on the food supply. For that reason families were separated in the workhouses: Victorians were very opposed to public sexual displays, so needless to say that they wouldn't have taken any of the few chances they had to make a baby. The utilitarian view is what encouraged the creation of the workhouses to begin with; the idea was that if the poor were allowed to live in their own homes, they wouldn't work harder to provide for themselves, so they were placed in the worst living conditions imaginable to give them a reason to work harder to leave.
If you're talking about the Victorian era, they're treated poorly. poor people lived in workhouses working up to 12 hrs a day for under above the age of 4. They eight mostly bread and cheese but some of them were so hungry they did eat the bones that was used for the fertilizer.
bom chic hom
they woke up when ever they wanted to
The term "Victorian" refers to the period of the reign of Queen Victoria (1837 - 1901). "Victorians" refers to the people living at that time.
There were thousands of moods but children were mostly tempered (People in workhouses)
workhouses or the streets
Victorians had workhouses as a solution for poverty relief and a way to provide work and shelter to the poor. However, they were also seen as a deterrent to idleness and were designed to be harsh to discourage people from seeking assistance unless absolutely necessary.
The rich Victorians Earned money by working in Cafes , workhouses and as a shop keeper!
The people were treated poorly at workhouses.
Are there no workhouses? Are there no prisons? And the treadmill is that still employed.
not much
workhouses were ment to be harsh so people didn't want help from them. The workhouses were ment for people who were sick,poor,orphans,etc.
Victorians in workhouses often worked long hours, typically around 10-12 hours per day, six days a week. The work was often tedious and strenuous, and the conditions were harsh, contributing to poor health and low morale among the workers.
Some Victorians pitied the poor and tried to be charitable to them. However, the prevalent systems in dealing with the poor were based on Malthusian and utilitarian ideals. Basically, Malthusian thought said that the poor reproduced at a rate that would eventually put a strain on the food supply. For that reason families were separated in the workhouses: Victorians were very opposed to public sexual displays, so needless to say that they wouldn't have taken any of the few chances they had to make a baby. The utilitarian view is what encouraged the creation of the workhouses to begin with; the idea was that if the poor were allowed to live in their own homes, they wouldn't work harder to provide for themselves, so they were placed in the worst living conditions imaginable to give them a reason to work harder to leave.
If you're talking about the Victorian era, they're treated poorly. poor people lived in workhouses working up to 12 hrs a day for under above the age of 4. They eight mostly bread and cheese but some of them were so hungry they did eat the bones that was used for the fertilizer.
Because they were made to be slaves or threatened to be killed