answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Battleships had an armored belt along the waterline. It was intended to stop shells that hit their sides and to prevent flooding by underwater explosions due to near misses. World War II battleships had lighter upper armored belts to protect sides up to the main or weather deck. Main belt thickness along the waterline ranged from 10" to 15", upper belt thickness ranged from 4" to 10".

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the destoryers have armor sides during World War 2?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What country changed sides during world war 2 and why?

Yes


What sides were the countries in North Africa on during World War 2?

generally, on the sides of the countries they were colonies of


Which countries suffered the biggest losses during world war 1?

Russia suffered the greatest loss of life during World War I. There were thousands of casualties on all sides suffered during the war.


Who used the machine guns during world war?

All sides involved did.


What country fought on both sides during World War 2?

Romania is an example.


What relationship did turkey have with great Britain during World War 1?

They were on opposite sides.


How did Germany lose Russia as an ally during World War 1?

== == Russia and Germany were never allies during World War I. They were on opposite sides from the beginning.


Who traded sides and why during world war 2?

Russia traded sides because Germany broke their treaty agreement and invaded. They switched to the Allies.


What 2 sides were there during World War 1?

Allied powers vs Central powers


What was the religion during World War 2?

The question makes no sense. Christians were on both sides of the fighting.


Did Italy fight for both sides during World War 1?

yes :P they did because they were boss


Did the James C Owens have armor sides?

The James C. Owens was part of the Sumner class of destroyers. They were designed to be an improvement on the Fletcher class. Since the Fletcher class had 0.75" side armor and 0.5" deck armor, it is to be assumed that the Sumner class destroyers, like the James C. Owens did have side and deck armor.