The proper grammar would be that he ate the bones.
'Did the dog eat the bones' because it is singular.
Fish bones are usually very small and soft (as they are cartilagenous) so it should pass through the dog without causing any problems.
well, easy they like the stuff in the middle so they get to that first, then they eat the shell.
it might get in its throat and then it would die
if a dog eats mice poison you should see a vet about it
Flush before the dog can eat it
Dog food and bones not chicken bones.
if a dog eats ants its perfectly fine dogs eat everything
A dog eats when he wants too and u have to make him.
A dog eats in a bowl for its food and a bowl for its water.
can dog eat confetti
a dog can eat any type of bone but the question you should have asked is is it healthy for a dog to eat deer bones then in that case the answer would be no
Bones are for dogs and if you have them you better not let a dog catch you or the dog will eat you alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Depends if your a dog or not.
No, It would be "The dog has eaten," or "The dog ate."Eat is the present tense. You want to match the tenses. If the dog is presently eating, you could say, "The dog eats." But if you are referring to the past eating behavior of the dog, it is as above, the dog has eaten, or the dog ate. I eat, you eat, they eat, is all present tense. Ate and eaten are both past tense, I have eaten, or I ate, etc.