answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Records seem to indicate that Dred Scott was born into slavery in Virginia and lived there until he was in his early 20s, when he moved to Huntsville, Alabama, the Peter Blow family, and five other slaves sometime in the 1820s. Scott relocated to St. Louis, Missouri with the Blow family in 1930, then was sold to Dr. Emerson, an Army surgeon, sometime between 1831 and 1833.

Emerson and Scott were transferred between several Southern and Midwest military posts during their time together. On December 1, 1833, the two men relocated to Fort Armstrong, in Rock Island, Illinois, which adhered to the rules of the Northwest Ordinance prohibiting slavery, and was a free state. Scott's status as slave should have ended when he entered Illinois; however, it is not clear that Scott was aware of this law.

In May 1836, Scott traveled with Dr. Emerson to Fort Snelling, in what was then part of the Wisconsin Territory (today, Ft. Snelling is part of Minnesota), which also prohibited slavery.

While at Ft. Snellling, Dred Scott met Harriet Robinson, a slave Dr. Emerson acquired from a Major Taliaferro, and the two married in late 1836 or early 1837.

Dr. Emerson was reassigned to St. Louis, Missouri, in October 1837, but was forced to leave Dred and Harriet in the hire of others at Ft. Snelling because weather conditions were too poor for the three of them to travel safely. As soon as Emerson arrived in St. Louis, he was reassigned to Louisiana, where he met and married his wife, Irene Sanford.

In 1838, the Scott family voluntarily left Ft. Snelling to reunite with the Emersons in Louisiana, a slave state. After spending a few more months in Louisiana, the four returned to Fort Snelling in the Wisconsin Territory.

On May 29, 1840, Dr. Emerson was assigned to Florida to care for troops fighting in the Seminole War. Due to the dangerous conditions, he left his wife Irene and the Scotts in the care of Irene's father, Alexander Sanford, in St. Louis, Missouri.

Dr. Emerson was discharged from the military in 1842 and returned to St. Louis to start a private medical practice. Unable to succeed in St. Louis, Emerson relocated to Iowa. It is not clear whether the Scotts accompanied him to Iowa or remained in St. Louis; however, they were in St. Louis after Dr. Emerson died in 1843, where they remained for the rest of their lives.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Yes. The Chief Justice interpreted the Constitution as he judged that the Founding Fathers had meant it.

When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the dred Scott case keep slaves as property?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Military History

What court case determind that slaves were not US citizens in the Civil War?

The slave Dred Scott. This was before the war - and one of the causes of it, because it divided the two sides further and raised the temperature of the debate.


What years did the Dred Scott decision take place prior to the Civil War?

The Dred Scott decision or Dred Scott v. Sandford, took place in 1857. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). Dred Scott lost the case when The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two, on the grounds that he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules.


Who is a slave who sued for his freedom and lost before the civil war?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)AnswerDred Scott sued for his freedom.The US Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in defendant John Sanford's favor, returning Dred Scott and his family to slavery. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the Opinion of the Court that held slaves, former slaves and descendants of slaves could never be US citizens.AnswerThat was Dred Scott. He should have claimed his freedom while he was on free soil, but he was brought back into slave country, and tried to claim his freedom when his status was subject to debate. This caused immense trouble - and arguably started the Civil War.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Why wasn't Dred Scott free?

Dred Scott Was not Freed Because of the severe Racism and discrimination against slaves. Most slave owners did their best to make slaves miserable. this was not in scotts case though. He was also not freed because the chief justice that oversaw scotts hearing was Proslavery which completley put out scotts chances of being freed. Taney Decreed that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional, Scott was to stay a slave, Scott was not a U.S. citizen, and he could not sue BECAUSE he wasn't a U.S. citizen.


What are some characteristics about Dred Scott?

What are some characteristics of Dred Scott

Related questions

What did the Dred Scott case say?

that slaves were property


What case determined that African American slaves were not citizens?

dred scott...a+


What court case said that slaves were property not people?

The Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857 ruled that slaves were property, not citizens, and therefore could not bring a case to court. The decision further deepened the divide between the North and South on the issue of slavery.


What did the Supreme Court called slaves?

The Supreme Court referred to slaves as property in the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857.


The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?

the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee


Which Supreme Court case ruled that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights?

Dred Scott v. Sandford


What was stated in the dred scott decision?

Slaves were the property of their owners.


Why if it was decided to end slavery after the dred Scott case was there still division?

The Dred Scott ruling did not move the country closer to ending slavery. It astonished the Abolitionists by invoking the original terms of the Constitution - that a man's property was sacred, and that slaves were property. It widened the division.


What was the Dred Scott decisoin?

Basically it said that slaves were property and had no rights. Therefore Scott had no standing to sue.


What was th famous court case that determined slaves were property?

The Dred Scott case of 1857. The findings of the Supreme Court greatly offended the powerful Abolitionist lobby.


Who was a slave who sued his owner for freedom?

Dred Scott was a slave who sued his owner for freedom in the United States in the 1850s. The case, Dred Scott v. Sandford, reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled against Scott, stating that slaves were property and not citizens, thereby denying his freedom.


What did the supreme. court rule in the dred Scott case?

The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.