answersLogoWhite

0

Yes. Congress could NOT tell territories or states not to have slaves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?

One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.


Who was the subject of a supreme court decision on slavery?

Dred Scott


What opened all territories to slavery?

dred scott decision


The Dred Scott decision interpreted the constitution as allowing?

It allowed slavery and found Scott to be property.


Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?

Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south


What was the judges decision in the Dred Scott Case?

it made slavery and the western territory


What was the the importance of the Dred Scott decision?

The US Supreme Court was an important decision. Here are some facts about this: A. The Court confirmed that Dred Scott was not a citizen; B. The Court confirmed that slavery was not illegal; C. The Court confirmed that freed slaves were not citizens nor could they be; and D. It was a blow to the anti slavery abolitionist movement.


What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


What supreme court decision overturned efforts to limit the spread of slavery?

dred scott


What did the south think about the dred Scott decision?

The South supported the Dred Scott decision, as it reinforced the rights of slave owners to take their slaves into territories where slavery was prohibited. They viewed it as a victory for protecting their property rights and upholding the institution of slavery.


What describes the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.


What did the supreme court in its decision in the dred Scott case?

The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(