No, just the opposite. They didn't want a king so they made sure that there was checks and balances on the branches of government.
The Framers didn't have differing views on Presidential power; instead, they believed the Executive branch should be "checked."
The Framers didn't have differing views on Presidential power; instead, they believed the Executive branch should be "checked."
The framers did not want the President or the Executive branch to have too much power. They addressed this concern by setting up a system of checks and balances, with Congress and the Judiciary also having power to supplement the President's power. The executive branch has generally become more powerful over the years.
Little of the check and balance system that protected the British citizens in Britain itself extended to the colonies. Not wanting to exchange an authoritarian abroad for one at home, the framers wanted to avoid a government where the executive could rise to that same level of power.
The power of the Executive branch is to enforce laws enacted by the Legislative branch.
Power maintained by the legislative branch over the executive branch is to help keep the executive in check. The legislative has the power to veto executive polices and can also impeach the president and other executive officers.
executive branch.
The power of the executive branch is enforce the laws,the power of the legislative branch is to make laws, and the power of the judicial branch is to interpret the laws
The President is the power of the executive branch. He appoints all of the leaders of the 15 departments.
Executive branchIn the United States government, the President (the head of the Executive Branch) has the power to veto legislation.
No. This power is in the Legislative branch. The Executive branch enforces the law.
The Senate.