no they actually in the beginning almost had no professional army, no navy. As the revolution progressed the soldiers increased and numbers and grew more professional.
Athens had a strong navy, while Sparta had a better army
novanet answer : to gain their freedom
novanet answer : to gain their freedom
The Patriots struggled with not having a strong navy. They overcame this problem by sinking British ships & recieved help from the Native Americans.
Germany had a strong army. Japan had a strong navy.
it was their firstline of defense because it was an island surrounded by water so their navy had to be top notch
Two advantages the British had over the patriots were the British had a Navy and the Patriots didn't and the British had a well trained and more experienced army than the Patriots.
they had a strong army & Navy also they knew the land
Americans: Continental Army, Patriots, or rebels British: British Navy, lobster backs, or red coats
For centuries, Turkey has always had a very strong and dangerous army, but their navy is somewhat small.
It main strength at the beginning of the Punic Wars against Rome was it's navy. When Rome developed it's own navy, the Carthaginians recruited it's army from Spain, North Africa and northern Italy, with a strong cavalry arm.
didnt have a lot of people in their army. low on money