Under Roman law, anything which could be held for a year without challenge could be kept. While the soldiers were away during extended wars, they were not able to challenge the takeover of the common land by big landowners.
Small-farmers relied on the common land to graze their ploughing oxen and to provide edible nuts and other produce to supplement what they could grow on their own small plots, which became unviable when the common land was lost to them (the same thing happened in England in the 16th Century CE enclosures of the common land).
In addition, the wars produced a great supply of slaves, who replaced free labour.
This double displacement enriched the upper classes who took advantage of all this, and impoverished the lower classes.
The collapse of the small farming class, who provided the backbone of the army, weakened Rome's military capacity which led to the recruitment of the non-propertied class during the Germanic invasion. These unpropertied men had no farms to return to after a war, and turned to their generals to provide for them. The generals used these clients to further their own power aspirations.
These changes sowed the seeds of the civil wars.
uneven development
He was wealthy.
The feudal system was imposed on serfs (poor farmers) by Princes: the wealthy nobility.
The wealthy were able to enjoy a great deal of leisure time, while the poor worked extremely long hours each week.
Most union soldiers were wealthy and well organized.
Terrorism and skyrocketing unemployment rates
A wealth gap is the difference between rich and poor people
more division and more crime
Yes they do
Middle class
uneven development
it is poor
he lived regularly not to wealthy nor too poor
he was poor
poor
poor
The Anasazi were very wealthy.