answersLogoWhite

0

Tycho Brahe did not have the wrong conclusion about the motion of the planets. He was in fact very correct about his observations.

User Avatar

Kaylah Ward

Lvl 13
1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusions about motions of the planets. true or false?

did Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusion about motions of the planets. true or false?


Tycho brahe came to the wrong conclusions about the motions of the planets so were all his years of work wasted?

false


Is it true that Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusion about the motions of the planets?

false


Is it true that Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusions about the motions of the planets?

As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.As far as I know, Tycho Brahe made detailed observations of the planets' positions; he did NOT draw conclusions from that. Conclusions were drawn by other people, especially Kepler and Newton.


Did tycho brahe come to the wrong conclusion about the motion of the planets?

Tycho Brahe did not have the wrong conclusion about the motion of the planets. He was in fact very correct about his observations.


Tycho Brahe came to the wrong conclusions about the motion of the planets so all his years of work were wasted true or false?

False. No scientist gets everything EXACTLY right, not even Newton or Einstein or Hawking. Brahe's observations were astoundingly accurate, and he interpreted them as well as he could, but his years of painstaking observations made it possible for others to improve on his analytical work. Wasted? Not hardly!


Which scientist made highly accurate measurements that disproved the theories of ptolemy and Copernicus?

Tycho Brahe designed new equipment to measure planets' positions with unprecedented accuracy. Tycho's observations of the planets' orbits led to his alternative model which still had the Earth at the centre with the Sun orbiting it, but with the five other known planets orbiting the Sun. But Tycho's measurements were used by his assistant Kepler to produce an entirely new theory in 1609 with the planets in elliptical orbits, all orbiting the Sun as in Copernicus's model of 1543. Kepler's theory is still used today. It's important to remember that the theories of Ptolemy and Copernicus are not 'wrong', it would be better to say they are not as accurate as Kepler's theory. As models, all three of them predict the planets' positions fairly accurately.


What des misleading mean in math?

It means that it can result in wrong conclusions.


Why do scientists probably want to leave what they do open to revision?

Their conclusions could be wrong. -J.C.B.


What is the definition of misleading in math?

"Misleading" means that it can easily make you draw wrong conclusions.


Does Uranus spin the wrong way?

Yes it does. "Wrong ???' Try different from most of the other planets.


Why did early Greek astronomers think that all celestial bodies moved in circular motions?

Not all of them did. The ones who did believe in strictly circular motions were influenced by Aristotle, who may have been the wrong-est person who ever lived.