I believe that it is safe to say that everyone, at one time or another, has probably harbored such thoughts. Whether they acted on them or not is the function of how they view societal pressure as expressed in morals, ethics, and the law.
No, I am programmed to adhere to ethical guidelines and legal boundaries at all times. If a task were to cross those lines, I would not be able to engage in it.
The past tense of "I think you are doing well" would be "I thought you were doing well."
i think that would be a cylider i have a crossward puzzle im doing with the same question for a science thing at school the only thing i know of on here is a cylinder
There is no specific Myers-Briggs personality type associated with the majority of criminals. Criminal behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of various factors such as upbringing, environment, social influences, and personal circumstances rather than just personality type.
When someone says you had a reflection about something, it means you took the time to think deeply or consider carefully about that particular topic or issue. It suggests that you paused to analyze, ponder, or evaluate your thoughts or actions in relation to that subject. The word "reflection" implies a thoughtful introspection or contemplation.
"One of the most famous novels exploring the effect of guilt on a person's life is Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky. The protagonist, Raskolnikov, grapples with overwhelming guilt after committing a heinous crime and the psychological toll it takes on his mind and soul."
Did you ever think about doing something which, if you had done it, would have been a crime
Then it would be crime because it would be acceptable. the only thing that makes something a crime is that you will get punished for it. if there are no consequences then it will not be considered a crime because everyone will be doing it. :)
Indiscriminate means to do something randomly or without careful judgment. An example would be doing a crime without thinking about what would happen.
yes because it can make you think about doing the same thing and can get you killed if so doing it so i would say yea
It would depend on the crime, the jurisdiction, and the additional circumstances during the crime.
Crimes are the act of doing something that is not accepted by society. There are consequences for crimes--punishment. Punishments are the things you receive in response to commiting a crime. Example: Murdering is a crime. The punishment for this would be a death sentence or life in prison.
I think that it depends on what you are doing if you are doing something hard I would do it with others but if it is easy for you you should do it by yourself
That is a pretty open ended question. Without all the information, I think the biggest things are to question your situation.Do you feel he told you the truth about what he went to jail for?Do you think it is something he would ever do again, or did he just mess up?Was the crime something that you feel truly says something about him? If so, what?Was the crime something that you would be morally, ethically, or religiously opposed to?Was it it something violent? Did it hurt someone?
He or she would be charged with the crime and tried, just as he/she would otherwise.
Well something that is not serious like assault....Well Crime is a crime but I would say a low level crime would be something like, stop light run, or something like, damaging of someone property-like egging someones house...
1- A persuasive speechA persuasive speech works to convince people to change in some way: they think, the way they do something, or to start doing something that they are not currently doing.
This would be doing something subconsciously.