I believe that it is safe to say that everyone, at one time or another, has probably harbored such thoughts. Whether they acted on them or not is the function of how they view societal pressure as expressed in morals, ethics, and the law.
There is speculation on this, but the typical evil genius type would be INTJ, this is seen with people like Hannibal Lector from Silence of the Lambs or Mr. Burns from The Simpsons. I feel like it would depend on the crime. I feel like petty crime the criminal would have to be observant as well as not caring about the crime and having a fairly good plan so therefore be XSTJ, with X allowing it to be either introverted or extroverted. But I think the typical evil criminal would be an INTJ. But there are many other factors to this, such as crimes of necessity, the type of crime it is, and whether or not they are easily caught.
To look back upon or to think about something. It is also possible to reflect on something that will happen in the future.Ex: Tom reflected on the choices he had and the consequences they would bring.
Well, honestly you'd have to ask those "people"!! But I would assume that some people probably think that all kinds of peer pressure are bad because they encourage someone to follow a crowd and be influenced by their friends rather than doing what they think is right. This would be why some people think there are no good forms of peer pressure
If it's positive peer pressure: It can encourage someone to do something and/or give them confidence If it's negative peer pressure: they would be influenced into doing the wrong thing and/or it can make them nervous mess up on something like a performance or a presentation
i think that would be a cylider i have a crossward puzzle im doing with the same question for a science thing at school the only thing i know of on here is a cylinder
Did you ever think about doing something which, if you had done it, would have been a crime
Then it would be crime because it would be acceptable. the only thing that makes something a crime is that you will get punished for it. if there are no consequences then it will not be considered a crime because everyone will be doing it. :)
Indiscriminate means to do something randomly or without careful judgment. An example would be doing a crime without thinking about what would happen.
yes because it can make you think about doing the same thing and can get you killed if so doing it so i would say yea
It would depend on the crime, the jurisdiction, and the additional circumstances during the crime.
Crimes are the act of doing something that is not accepted by society. There are consequences for crimes--punishment. Punishments are the things you receive in response to commiting a crime. Example: Murdering is a crime. The punishment for this would be a death sentence or life in prison.
I think that it depends on what you are doing if you are doing something hard I would do it with others but if it is easy for you you should do it by yourself
That is a pretty open ended question. Without all the information, I think the biggest things are to question your situation.Do you feel he told you the truth about what he went to jail for?Do you think it is something he would ever do again, or did he just mess up?Was the crime something that you feel truly says something about him? If so, what?Was the crime something that you would be morally, ethically, or religiously opposed to?Was it it something violent? Did it hurt someone?
He or she would be charged with the crime and tried, just as he/she would otherwise.
Well something that is not serious like assault....Well Crime is a crime but I would say a low level crime would be something like, stop light run, or something like, damaging of someone property-like egging someones house...
1- A persuasive speechA persuasive speech works to convince people to change in some way: they think, the way they do something, or to start doing something that they are not currently doing.
This would be doing something subconsciously.