Ethical responsibilities are established by society itself, through history and those things that most people consider to be the 'right thing to do.' In that situation, society punishes disturber.
Legal responsibility is when the state uses laws to punish actions of a person by using of legal methods.
Legal responsibility is business ethics. You can research the topic or check with the Small Business Administration.
Mortimer D. Schwartz has written: 'Problems in legal ethics' -- subject(s): Cases, Legal ethics 'Problems in legal ethics' -- subject(s): Cases, Legal ethics 'Problems in legal ethics' -- subject(s): Cases, Legal ethics
Jack A. Guttenberg has written: 'The law of professional responsibility in Ohio' -- subject(s): Legal ethics
Personal and legal ethics are distinct. Legal ethics may require conduct inconsistent with one's personal ethics, which is the basis for a good deal of the criticism of the legal profession. However, it is understandable, or should be, that there is a distinction between personal and legal ethics. Legal ethics involves obligations owed to clients, third parties, courts and to the profession itself. In that sense one's personal ethics may be simpler to apply as there are fewer variables when one is acting in one's personal capacity than there are when one is acting as a lawyer.
"The difference between ethics and morals can seem somewhat arbitrary to many, but there is a basic, albeit subtle, difference. Morals define personal character, while ethics stress a social system in which those morals are applied. In other words, ethics point to standards or codes of behavior expected by the group to which the individual belongs. This could be national ethics, social ethics, company ethics, professional ethics, or even family ethics. So while a person's moral code is usually unchanging, the ethics he or she practices can be other-dependent. When considering the difference between ethics and morals, it may be helpful to consider a criminal defense lawyer. Though the lawyer's personal moral code likely finds murder immoral and reprehensible, ethics demand the accused client be defended as vigorously as possible, even when the lawyer knows the party is guilty, even at the expense of setting him free possibly to murder again. Legal ethics must override personal morals for the greater good of upholding a justice system in which the accused are given a fair trial and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt." - http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-difference-between-ethics-and-morals.htm
W. Bradley Wendel has written: 'Professional Responsibility Examples & Explanations, 2e (Examples & Explanations)' 'Professional responsibility' -- subject(s): Legal ethics
Mandatory ethics pertain to the professional requirements that are put in place legally to keep professionals out of legal trouble.Aspirational ethics is the understanding of the purpose of the ethical statues and living by these ethical standards as a way of life.Corey, G., Schneider-Corey, M., & Callanan, P. (2007). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Integrity, Effort, and Respect
What is the difference between legal and educational definitions for hearing and visual impaired.
The difference between compliance and legal is that compliance means you obey by the rules of your company, you do what you are told to do. Legal means you abide by the laws of the state.
Arthur F. Greenbaum has written: 'Lawyer's guide to the Ohio code of professional responsibility' -- subject(s): Legal ethics
John Floyd Sutton has written: 'Cases and materials on the professional responsibility of lawyers' -- subject(s): Cases, Legal ethics