When a machine is 100% efficient, theoretical and actual MAs are the same.
Please let me know when you run across one of these.
Whichever has the greater Mechanical Advantage.
At perfect 100% efficiency, the Actual Mechanical Advantage should equal the Ideal Mechanical Advantage.
the difference between the real mechanical advantage and the speed ratio is -the real mechanical advantage gets affected by friction so the real mechanical advantage gets smaller than the mechanical advantage you calculate. so the real mechanical advantage gets smaller than the speed ratio (because of the friction) and that's why the efficiency never gets 100% efficient (efficiency ; mechanical advantage/ speed ratio x 100(%))
Wear and tear of moving parts would be reduced. Less energy would be needed to run the machine, as there would be less friction to be overcome. A well lubricated machine is more efficient than a neglected machine with unoiled parts.
Nothing is 100% efficient because friction acts opposite on everything.
Whichever has the greater Mechanical Advantage.
Perfect efficiency
At perfect 100% efficiency, the Actual Mechanical Advantage should equal the Ideal Mechanical Advantage.
the difference between the real mechanical advantage and the speed ratio is -the real mechanical advantage gets affected by friction so the real mechanical advantage gets smaller than the mechanical advantage you calculate. so the real mechanical advantage gets smaller than the speed ratio (because of the friction) and that's why the efficiency never gets 100% efficient (efficiency ; mechanical advantage/ speed ratio x 100(%))
Even the best screws only have a mechanical advantage of twenty percent. Therefore, the screw is not a very efficient lifting device.
Wear and tear of moving parts would be reduced. Less energy would be needed to run the machine, as there would be less friction to be overcome. A well lubricated machine is more efficient than a neglected machine with unoiled parts.
The mechanical advantage of something is related to the power input (fuel) and the power output (work) that the machine is given/gives out (respectively) I'm not entirely sure what means what (i.e. a mechanical advantage of over 1 or 3 or whatever = efficient, and such) Hope I helped. If you need to, I think the last place I saw a lesson on this was in a Holt physical science book, if you wanted to search for that lesson online or something.
The mechanical advantage of something is related to the power input (fuel) and the power output (work) that the machine is given/gives out (respectively) I'm not entirely sure what means what (i.e. a mechanical advantage of over 1 or 3 or whatever = efficient, and such) Hope I helped. If you need to, I think the last place I saw a lesson on this was in a Holt physical science book, if you wanted to search for that lesson online or something.
It is efficient.
It is efficient!
efficient
Yes, and its one of the most efficient ways to get mechanical energy at 95%.