If your statement is true (I doubt that EVERY case is affirmed) it must mean that the lower courts are doing their jobs correctly.
When a case is resolved by the lower trial court, the losing party can appeal that decision to a higher, reviewing court. The lawyers for each side submit briefs, which are written versions of their arguments as to why the trial court committed some kind of error. After the appellate judges review the briefs, the lawyers conduct oral argument before the appellate panel of judges. They then render their decision.
An intermediate court of appeal is a court, usually in bigger states, that may take an appeal from a trial court. Above the intermediate court of appeal is the supreme court of a state. Consists of about 3-5 judges.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
The criminal court of appeals is the highest state court. Judges are elected for the position in the state courts of appeal.
When parties appeal, they submit appellate briefs to the appellate court. The briefs point out the issues and make an argument for how the court should decide them. The court reviews the arguments, the law, and the facts to decide on each issue.
They're just called judges, or sometimes appellate judges. The Appeals Court is made up of one Chief Judge and six associate judges.
At trial, one. On appeal, it depends on the court.
deciding cases on their own
If an individual decided to appeal a court-martial, it would come before the Court of Military Appeals. It is a civilian court made up of three judges.
No. When an appellate court hears an appeal from a lower court, it will either affirm (i.e.: approve of) the prior court's decision (not the case), or reverse the prior decision. If the prior decision is affirmed, then the prior holding stands.
You cannot sue a judge. You can appeal the judgment.
It means that they have - AFFIRMED THE VERDICT OF THE TRIAL COURT.