you know becaude me say every day no say yes you know tomorow me have school at deda
The top ten inventions of all time are ones that people still use today like the toilet. Other inventions used include the electric stove, cell phones, and computers.
He invented the microprocessor & it increases speed of computer:)He deals with lots of computers..All computers include one of his inventions:)Read more: How_did_Marcian_Hoff's_invention_change_computers
The most famous inventions of all time include alcohol, internet, birth control, medicine, anesthetics, printers, light bulbs, plumbing, language, cell phones, and computers.
no, his invention was the 4004. many newer inventions have long superseded it, but it was the breakthrough that made the later inventions possible. Very much like the Fairchild invention of the planar transistor was the breakthrough that made monolithic ICs possible, but ICs aren't just lots of planar transistors, they have other components as well as wiring on the one chip.
Yes, all computers include a central processing unit (CPU), which is a fundamental invention of computer architecture. The CPU, often referred to as the "brain" of the computer, executes instructions and processes data. Additionally, many modern computers utilize components and concepts developed by pioneers like John von Neumann, who contributed to the design of the stored-program architecture. Therefore, in a broad sense, computers incorporate various inventions critical to their operation.
Yes
Computers, iPhones, and flat screen televisions are all inventions that didn't exist 100 years ago. Cell phones and smart appliances are a few more.
Thomas Edison had many inventions that are still in use today. These inventions include the tin foil phonograph, the incandescent light bulb, electricity, the motion picture player, and many others.
Some but not all Dell computers include an S/PDIF connector as part of the sound card.
China's inventions were paper, n dats all i memeba
All his inventions were electricity related.
There has been a long-standing, minor debate about whether Luke copied Marcion or vice versa. The evidence that Marcion copied Luke is so strong that there should be no real debate.First of all, there is compelling evidence that Luke used Mark's Gospel as his primary source for the life of Jesus. Whenever Luke repeats a passage from Mark, the Greek text is almost identical. Luke's Gospel is famous for the "missing block" of material from Mark, that results in the puzzling verse at Luke 9:18 "And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him ...", which can be explained by looking at Mark 6:47 and Mark 8:27. One of the authors must have copied Mark, and it is unlikely to have been Marcion. Luke's Gospel and Luke's Acts of the Apostles both appear to contain background material sourced from Josephus. Since there is no dispute that Luke wrote Acts, this makes it highly probable that he did not copy the Gospel from Marcion.Marcion's Gospel is similar to Luke's Gospel, but omits references to the Old Testament, which Marcion rejected. It is not plausible that Marcion wrote a gospel without references to the Old Testament and then Luke copied Marcion and skilfully put appropriate Old Testament into his version.Marcion wrote his gospel after 140 CE. So if Luke copied Marcion, he would have written his gospel after about 150 CE, which is too late to be plausible.On the other handMarcion as pre-dating LukeCharles B. Waite was one of the first to propose in History of the Christian Religion to the Year Two-Hundred in 1881 that Marcion's Gospel may have preceded Luke's Gospel. John Knox (not the same as the Scottish reformer John Knox) in Marcion and the New Testament also defends this hypothesis. Some recent scholars have agreed. In this case, Luke's gospel was not finished. There are two possibilities: Either Marcion and Luke both based their gospels on an earlier, common source (such as Matthew and Mark in the Augustinian hypothesis), or the Gospel of Luke was based on Marcion's gospel. For those who wish to do some review, use the link below to the Gospel of Marcion in Wikipedia. An introduction can be found there, and links to other sources where the full text is posted are available in the footnotes.