No they don't, because then they wouldn't get any where.
Yes, Amnesty International engages in lobbying as part of its advocacy efforts to promote human rights. The organization works to influence policymakers and governments by presenting evidence, reports, and recommendations on various issues. Lobbying is a strategic tool for Amnesty to push for legislative changes and hold authorities accountable for human rights violations.
George H.W. Bush suspended arms sales to China in 1989 in response to the Tiananmen Square protests and the subsequent violent crackdown by the Chinese government. The decision reflected the U.S. commitment to human rights and the desire to distance itself from a regime that demonstrated a willingness to use brutal force against its citizens. This action was part of a broader international condemnation of China's actions during the protests.
Amnesty International has not been directly responsible for preventing any specific genocide, as its role primarily involves advocacy, awareness-raising, and monitoring human rights abuses. However, the organization has played a significant part in mobilizing public opinion and pressuring governments to take action against potential genocides, such as in Darfur and Myanmar. Their efforts aim to prevent mass atrocities by highlighting human rights violations and calling for international intervention.
The war in Syria began in 2011 as part of the broader wave of protests known as the Arab Spring. It started with peaceful demonstrations against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, calling for political reforms and the release of political prisoners. The government's violent crackdown on these protests escalated tensions, leading to armed conflict between the regime and various opposition groups. Over time, the situation devolved into a complex multi-faceted civil war involving various domestic and international actors.
The non-shouters and the non-demonstrators. Note: This was after nearly a decade of loud protests, demonstrations, sit-in, and violent rallies with the Civil Rights Movement and protests over the Vietnam War. So though the words sound lame today, his comment addressed a huge part of US citizens who were not marching the streets or sitting to block access to public buildings.
Yes. It is part of freedom of speech. It is a part of a free country's rights. It is part of democracy. It lets people or organisations or governments know what others think. A country that does not allow protest is not giving people civil rights. As long as protests are not violent, then people should be able to protest and should do so.
when she was 23
An animal becomes extinct, but protests do not. The ability to protest is part of the Bill of Rights and is listed as freedom of speech.
President Abraham Lincoln offered amnesty primarily to Confederate soldiers and officials who were willing to take an oath of allegiance to the Union. His approach aimed to promote reconciliation and healing after the Civil War. The amnesty plan was part of his broader vision for Reconstruction, encouraging Southern states to rejoin the Union with a sense of forgiveness rather than punishment. However, certain high-ranking Confederate leaders were excluded from this amnesty.
Only genocide and Flowey the flower are violent because they are an important part of the story
President Jimmy Carter granted amnesty to draft dodgers in 1977. This policy allowed individuals who had evaded the military draft during the Vietnam War to apply for a pardon, reflecting a desire to heal the divisions caused by the war. The amnesty was part of Carter's broader efforts to promote national reconciliation.
A gold rush