The vast majority of scientists support evolution. There is no longer any debate in the scientific community about whether evolution occurs, only the mechanisms in which evolution acts upon is debated.
The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the theory of evolution. It is considered the foundational framework for understanding the history of life on Earth and is supported by a wide range of evidence from fields such as paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. Scientific understanding of evolution continues to evolve as new evidence and discoveries emerge.
Nothing at all. The element mercury is dealt with in chemistry, and not in any areas which are sometimes applied to evolution. The planet Mercury has never and will never contain life, so evolution has never taken place there.
The judge will be the one that will decide the how much if any income support you may be qualified to receive from the payer of the support amount.
social darwinism
Social Darwinism
Answer Creation Ministries International have a list of over 200 PhD scientists from a wide variety of fields who support creationism. There probably are a few more than this who do not wish to be named due to discrimination. The list assumes that a scientist with a PhD in any field (e.g. theoretical chemistry, physics, electrical engineering, psychology) is a "qualified" scientist (about 1/5th of the list are people in biological sciences, biochemistry, biophysics or geology), which should be considered when regarding the answer. There are also other creationist organizations with other lists that may include some names not on this list. So, the answer isn't completely known and depends on your definition of qualified. To put the number in perspective, there are a few hundred thousand PhD scientists in the world, and a list of scientists (mostly biologists) only with the first name Steve who agree with evolution (kept by NCSE) currently numbers 887 (28 May 2008).
Any proposition can be denied by those who do not wish to accept it, no matter how strong the evidence is. However, evolution can not rationally be denied. Scientists say they regard it as fact.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
social darwinism
Miltank does not have an evolution form in any of the Pokemon games.
They are good friends, but just because they have similar themes of evolution doesn't support any kind of romantic interest between them.
There isnt any noticeable evolution,..jst the way apes changed to man,........y not other animals show any changes?
Prior to reading the answers below, it is perhaps important to note that there is no 'creation theory'. There are various religious creation myths, but no comprehensive and robust scientific model that has any explanatory or predictive power.Answer: Quite a few scientists support creation theory. This places them out of step with the mainstream scientists who believe in autobiogenesis, or a spontaneous origin of life, coupled with evolution. As Richard Dawkins put it "It is a monumental disagreement. One side or the other has got to be wrong, and not just slightly wrong but catastrophically, ignominiously, disastrously wrong."Prior to the 20th Century, most scientists believed in Creation.Today, there are numerous organizations of scientists who support creation theory: Answers in Genesis ; Creation Research, Science Education Foundation; Institute for Creation Research; The Creation SuperLibrary and others. Some publish peer-reviewed journals, such as the Creation Research Society's CRS Journal and the Journal of Creation by Creation Ministries International (The Australian arm of Answers in Genesis).Answer While it is true that many "scientists" disagree with evolution in favor of creationism, that number drops significantly when you consider only those who study nature or life, and is almost non-existent when you consider only those with expertise in fields like biology, paleontology, geology or astronomy - the above list may seem impressive, but it is out of well over a hundred thousand PhD scientists alive today. Now it's also important to note that many scientists believe in some sort of god or creator, but are not creationists. Creationism generally refers to strict 6-day creation fundamentalism or the movement to teach that there is a god in science classes in public schools. About 60% of scientists believe in a personal god, many believe this god created life indirectly, which can be considered a different sort of creationism. Meanwhile about 99.85% of earth and life scientists (those same scientists who mostly believe in a personal god) accept evolution as well.Answer Yes, quite a few actually. Many scientists and researchers have come to support the creation theory because as they study 'Creation -vs- Evolution' they have found that there are more 'holes' in the evolution theory than there are in 'Creation'.Both Creationism and Evolution start with presuppositions. Evolution starts with the presupposition that God, if He exists, played no part in the development of species, but that they developed by macro-evolution or chance mutations that resulted in benefit to the organisms; Creationism presumes that He created all species, and that there are minor adaptions which occur naturally, called micro-evolution.