No. Aquatic plants do not have gills. Aquatic vertebrates, such as fish, have gills.
The primary function of external gills in aquatic animals is to exchanges gases. However, gas exchange is more difficult with external gills.
gills
Lizards do not have gills. They have lungs for breathing air, unlike aquatic animals that have gills to extract oxygen from water.
Erosion and sedimentation can negatively impact aquatic resources by reducing water quality, disrupting aquatic habitats, and impairing the health of aquatic organisms. Excessive sedimentation can smother aquatic plants and animals, clog fish gills, and degrade breeding areas. It can also increase the turbidity of water bodies, reducing light penetration and affecting the growth of aquatic plants.
salmon
Because they have gills and other special body parts that enables them to live in the aquatic habitat.
Yes, if they didn't they couldn't breath. Almost all aquatic based animals have gills.
Breathing is breathing is breathing whatever you use to do it with. There is no special term or word to my knowledge that specifically means "Breathing with gills".
through external gills
gills
the aquatic animals and plants also known as water animals and plants or marine animals and plants can survive in water.as our body is designed to live in a particular area, environment the same way the water animals and plants are also designed to live in water.most of them have gills or special organs which helps them to breathe in water as water also consists of air.this is how plants and animals survive in water.
Aquatic arthropods typically exchange gases through gills. Gills are structures that are rich in blood vessels and provide a large surface area for gas exchange to occur, allowing the arthropods to extract oxygen from the water and release carbon dioxide.