Both no and yes. When in a public place, we effectively give up our rights to privacy - we can be seen by a passer-by, someone may have a video camera, or a regular camera, or indeed a cell-phone, in which case a picture could be taken of us, and used in some way. So in this sense a cell-phone camera does not affect our privacy in any way. However, the interesting thing with cell-phone cameras is that they are, funnily enough, built into cell-phones. And since there is a difference between social rules and conventions for cell-phones and for cameras, it means that cell-phones will often be allowed in private places (e.g. a private wedding, meeting, bar). This practice, along with the subtlety of cell-phone cameras, means that pictures may be taken at private places, where people do have certain rights to privacy.
reliability, people and machines, privacy, surveillance, digital divide and equality of access
well you can call and text people, and take pictures and videos without being at home or having a camera.
the camera has let people in the 1800's to have memories of past times and events.
"cellphones" are useful to us because it can be our recreation..
With great connections nowadays, people usually use cellphones. Cellphones are more like of
to talk to people who are not with you
Cellphones are an easy way to contact people from mobile places and are very easy to use.
So they can communicate.
The motion picture camera helped socioety so we could record people and capture the memories of motion
Yes , Normally people get cellphones when they go to middle school
Jerky camera movements can affect some people that way.
yes, 14.3 people in Chile have cellphones