most people do cause they dont care about animals!
they can find out it breed and if it is mix or some they use animals taste and see if a medican is okay or not
Drug tests do not check for cigarette use.
Yes, insurance companies test for cigarette use before deciding to give you life insurance or to decide how high your premiums will be.
Helena Rubinstein does test on animals. Mice, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs are the most-used animals in these tests. Many companies have quit testing animals, and use the thousands of ingredients that have a long history of safe use in creating their new products.
NONE
if you are asking what kind of animals they use in experiments they use hamsters ,rabbits, guinea pigs ,dogs ,cats, frogs ,sheep ,cattle ,rats ,birds ,mice ,monkeys ,and chickens and many many more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 of the companies that tests on animals ALOT is iams!!!!!!!!
no its so wrong.
they can use any kind of animal, mice and rats are the most popular, but they use dogs, cats, pigs, and primates
Bvlgari is owned by the parent company LVMH. While it does not appear that Bvlgari tests on animals, some of the LVMH brands do use ingredients that have been tested on animals.
Although they are not required to do so by law, many cosmetic companies still perform tests on animals. Thousands of mice, guinea pigs, rats, and rabbits suffer and die in cosmetics tests every year in the United States alone. These tests can include:Skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of restrained rabbits without any pain reliefRepeated force-feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards such as cancer or birth defects; and"Lethal dose" tests, in which animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death.The researchers do not give the animals pain killers. At the end of a test, researchers kill the surviving animals. In the United States, over 95% of the animals used in such testing (such as laboratory-bred rats and mice) are not counted in official statistics and receive no protection under the Animal Welfare Act.Advanced non-animal tests represent the most humane, efficient, cost-effective, and relevant techniques that science has to offer, replacing outdated animal tests that were developed decades ago.Because animal testing for cosmetics and the marketing of cosmetics tested on animals have been completely banned in the European Union, many cosmetic companies are trying to find alternatives for all of the common cosmetics tests that use animals. Cosmetic companies in the United States that conduct animal tests will not be able to sell those products in Europe unless they change their practices.Companies have the option of using existing non-animal tests or investing in and developing alternative non-animal tests for new ingredients. There are a growing number of non-animal tests that can be used to determine the short-term safety of previously untested ingredients, and non-animal tests for longer term safety are under development. Nearly 50 non-animal tests have been validated for use, and these modern alternatives can offer results that are not only more relevant to humans, but more efficient and cost-effective.
NO!!!!!
Many companies use advertising on packaging stating that they do not test on animals as a corporate ethical statement, so the first line of acquiring the information would be to look there.Because of the ethical and moral implications companies would not advertise the fact that they do test on animals and it would be difficult to find such information in a companies literature if indeed they would even mention it.For a list of the companies that don't test on animals,you could go to Petakids.org