do federal prison visitation rights supersede states rights
Federal laws over-ride any conflicting state or local ordinances.
Federal law to supersede state law.
It is a Michigan state prison.
no
Yes, the Supreme Court should have the authority to supersede state-level decisions to ensure that constitutional rights are uniformly protected across the country. This oversight helps maintain a consistent interpretation of federal law and the Constitution, preventing states from enacting laws that may infringe on individual rights or undermine federal standards. However, this authority should be exercised judiciously to respect states' rights and local governance. Balancing federal oversight with state autonomy is crucial for a cohesive and fair legal system.
It is not a matter of which supercedes which, since you cannot be on dual parole (both state and federal) at the same time. What is this question asking?
(in the US) The state governments are in charge of their respective state prison systems, the federal government is in charge of the federal prison system.
federal law does over rule state law, however as Professor Jeffrey M. Shaman said "State courts can focus on local conditions within their states." "State constitutions contain various provisions not found in the federal constitution and state judges have rediscovered the historical foundations of their constitutions that guarantee rights and liberties."
prison, prison house, the joint, locked down, the big house, state correctional facility, state prison, federal prison, federal correctional facility, the pen
it gay chicken prison
Inmates are sent to federal or state prison due to their offenses. If they are tried at a state level for a state level offense, they will go to a state facility. If they have committed a federal crime, they will go to a federal penitentiary.
In the US it depends on the state in which the prison is located. Whether it is a state or federal prison. And, what type of job.